. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 12.

Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2011 Oct 17;79(6):814–825. doi: 10.1037/a0025874

Table 3.

Correlations Among the Measured and Latent Variables

Variable	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	10	11	12
1. Her education	—
2. His education	.54^*	—
3. Her income	.669^*	.38^*	—
4. His income	.34^*	.51^*	.213	—
5. Her religion	.25^*	.20^*	.15	.26^*	—
6. His religion	.14^*	.23^*	.08	.30^*	.53^*	—
7. Biological family	.24^*	.20^*	.13	.21^*	.16	.02	—
8. Her financial strain	−.30^*	−.24^*	−.51^*	−.45^*	−.08	−.12	−.12	—
9. His financial strain	−.25^*	−.27^*	−.37^*	−.58^*	−.19^*	−.24^*	−.16	.65^*	—
10. Married	.37^*	.36^*	.15	.57^*	.55^*	.29^*	.58^*	−.28^*	−.23^*	—
11. Her relationship quality	.02	.00	−.12	.05	.05	.18^*	−.19^*	−.37^*	3−.26^*	.18	—
12. His relationship quality	−.03	−.06	.04	.05	.17^*	.24^*	−.08	−.22^*	−.29^*	.21^*	.68^*	—
Relationship stability	.17	.22^*	.10	.34^*	.29^*	.15	.62^*	−.32^*	−.28^*	.50^*	.26^*	.18

p < .05, two-tailed.