Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 1;3(6):490–500. doi: 10.4161/gmic.21578

Table 5. Phylogenic abundance profile related with low glycinin soymilk (LGS), conventional soymilk (S) and bovine milk (M)1.

  LGS M S ANOVA2
Phylum
Baseline
3 Months
Baseline
3 Months
Baseline
3 Months
Treatment
Time
Interaction
Actinobacteria
0.10
0.32
0.29
0.43
0.13
0.24
0.14
< 0.01
0.27
Bacteroidetes
15.93
18.45
19.44
18.12
16.53
20.25
0.95
0.04
0.07
Chloroflexi
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.05
< 0.01
0.18
Cyanobacteria
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.76
< 0.01
0.67
Firmicutes
83.43
79.59
77.02
77.64
82.93
78.08
0.49
0.01
0.03
Fusobacteria
1.18
1.10
4.30
3.74
1.09
0.96
0.42
0.65
0.96
Proteobacteria
0.65
2.24
0.87
1.87
0.55
1.22
0.42
< 0.01
0.93
Tenericutes
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.01
0.01
0.00
0.94
0.34
0.64
TM7
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.58
< 0.01
0.40
Synergistetes
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.92
0.49
0.26
Verrucomicrobia
0.25
0.07
0.27
0.09
0.06
0.17
0.94
0.28
0.10
F / B ratio3 5.23 4.31 3.96 4.28 5.01 3.86 > 0.05 0.012 0.059

1Data expressed as average relative abundance. 2ANOVA: Prior to statistical analysis, relative abundances were transformed using an arcsin transformation. Mixed effects ANOVA, p < 0.05. 3F /B ratio was calculated by the relative abundance of Firmicutes divided by the relative abundance of Bacteroidetes.