Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 12;7(11):e48953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0048953

Table 2. Quantitative evaluation of all methods on different test sets.

Regression analysis Bland and Altman
Method Mean SI±SD ICC Slope y-intercept R2 Bias 95% limits
Fulldataset (unsupervisedmethods) WHASA 0.72±0.16 0.96 0.86 5.9 0.94 −4.4 [−39 30]
FS 0.40±0.13 0.52 0.29 4.64 0.82 −49 [−144 47]
Threshold 0.54±0.15 0.53 0.29 12.16 0.80 −41 [−136 54]
Test Set 1 WHASA 0.74±0.15 0.96 0.85 8.3 0.93 −4.5 [−42 33]
Best kNN 0.71±0.19 0.90 0.79 29 0.83 11 [−44 66]
Best SVM 0.72±0.16 0.89 0.68 17 0.88 −10 [−65 44]
Test Set 2 WHASA 0.71±0.16 0.96 0.87 5.3 0.93 −3.2 [−36 30]
Best kNN 0.63±0.22 0.87 0.73 19 0.79 0.3 [−56 57]
Best SVM 0.67±0.18 0.92 0.78 9.4 0.87 −5.1 [−51 41]
Test Set 3 WHASA 0.71±0.17 0.96 0.86 6.5 0.93 −4.2 [−41 32]
Best kNN 0.70±0.19 0.91 0.75 22 0.86 3.0 [−49 55]
Best SVM 0.70±0.19 0.94 0.80 15 0.90 −0.9 [−45 43]