Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Mol Cancer Ther. 2012 Aug 21;11(11):2483–2494. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0580

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

hCtr1 mRNA levels in cDDPR cells and their parental cells treated with different Cu-lowering agents. (A – C) RPA of endo-hCtr1 mRNA expression levels in three pairs of cells, i.e., 2008 (cDDPS)/2008-cp (cDDPR), A172 (cDDPs)/A172-CP (cDDPR), and SCLC (cDDPS)/SR2 (cDDPR), treated with different concentrations of TM (upper row), trientine (middle), or D-pen (lower) as indicated for 16 h. 18S RNA was used as an internal control. (D) Measurements of 64Cu uptake in three pairs of cDDPR/cDDPS cell lines with or without Cu-lowering agent added. (E) cDDP uptake measurements. Cells were treated with TM (5 µM), trientine or D-Pen (100 µM each) for 16 h. Greater sensitization of cDDPR cells to cDDP (F), carboplatin (G), but not oxaliplatin (H) than their parental cells, after treatment with Cu-lowering agents was shown *, p ≤ 0.05, Student’s t-test.