Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Demography. 2012 Nov;49(4):1479–1498. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0126-8

Table 5.

Socioeconomic characteristics of cohabitors by type of cohabiting union

Unmarried
Partner
Unionsa
Newly Identified
Householder
Unionsb
Subfamily
Unionsc
Total

(%) (%) (%) (%)
A. Education and Employment
 Educational attainment
  Both < high school 6.8 6.4 14.4* 7.3
  One < high school, no college graduate 14.6 14.5 21.3* 15.0
  Both high school graduate or some college 50.5 48.5 53.2 50.5
  One college graduate (4 yrs.) 17.4 16.5 7.1* 16.6
  Both college graduate (4 yrs.) 10.6 14.1* 4.0* 10.6
 Female more educated 28.6 29.2 26.5 28.5
 Enrolled in school (either) 8.1 7.4 12.7* 8.3
 Female works full-time 55.2 53.6 42.4* 54.1
 Male works full-time 68.9 65.2 62.1* 68.0
B. Poverty Status of Couples
 Couple poverty level: 2006–2008
  0–99 % of poverty threshold 9.9 10.8 22.0* 10.9
  100–199 % 18.3 14.6* 29.3* 18.5
  200–299 % 18.0 22.3* 18.3 18.5
  300%+ 53.8 52.3 30.4* 52.1
 Total family poverty level: 2006–2008
  0–99 % of poverty threshold 9.6 10.2 8.9 9.6
  100–199 % 18.6 15.5* 18.7 18.3
  200–299 % 17.9 22.4* 21.5 18.7
  300 %+ 53.8 51.9 50.9 53.4
C. Financial Assistance
 Couple receives regular financial assistance
 from outside household
2.4 1.5 0.8* 2.2
Unweighted n (couples) 7334 936 524 8,794

Note: The unit of analysis is the couple.

a

Unions between the householder and a person identified as their unmarried partner.

b

Newly identified unions between the householder and a person identified as a roommate or other nonrelative.

c

Newly identified unions between two persons who are not householders.

Source: Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey, 2007–2009.

*

Significantly different from estimate for unmarried partners (p < .05)