Table 5.
Socioeconomic characteristics of cohabitors by type of cohabiting union
| Unmarried Partner Unionsa |
Newly Identified Householder Unionsb |
Subfamily Unionsc |
Total | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
||||
| (%) | (%) | (%) | (%) | |
| A. Education and Employment | ||||
| Educational attainment | ||||
| Both < high school | 6.8 | 6.4 | 14.4* | 7.3 |
| One < high school, no college graduate | 14.6 | 14.5 | 21.3* | 15.0 |
| Both high school graduate or some college | 50.5 | 48.5 | 53.2 | 50.5 |
| One college graduate (4 yrs.) | 17.4 | 16.5 | 7.1* | 16.6 |
| Both college graduate (4 yrs.) | 10.6 | 14.1* | 4.0* | 10.6 |
| Female more educated | 28.6 | 29.2 | 26.5 | 28.5 |
| Enrolled in school (either) | 8.1 | 7.4 | 12.7* | 8.3 |
| Female works full-time | 55.2 | 53.6 | 42.4* | 54.1 |
| Male works full-time | 68.9 | 65.2 | 62.1* | 68.0 |
| B. Poverty Status of Couples | ||||
| Couple poverty level: 2006–2008 | ||||
| 0–99 % of poverty threshold | 9.9 | 10.8 | 22.0* | 10.9 |
| 100–199 % | 18.3 | 14.6* | 29.3* | 18.5 |
| 200–299 % | 18.0 | 22.3* | 18.3 | 18.5 |
| 300%+ | 53.8 | 52.3 | 30.4* | 52.1 |
| Total family poverty level: 2006–2008 | ||||
| 0–99 % of poverty threshold | 9.6 | 10.2 | 8.9 | 9.6 |
| 100–199 % | 18.6 | 15.5* | 18.7 | 18.3 |
| 200–299 % | 17.9 | 22.4* | 21.5 | 18.7 |
| 300 %+ | 53.8 | 51.9 | 50.9 | 53.4 |
| C. Financial Assistance | ||||
| Couple receives regular financial assistance from outside household |
2.4 | 1.5 | 0.8* | 2.2 |
| Unweighted n (couples) | 7334 | 936 | 524 | 8,794 |
Note: The unit of analysis is the couple.
Unions between the householder and a person identified as their unmarried partner.
Newly identified unions between the householder and a person identified as a roommate or other nonrelative.
Newly identified unions between two persons who are not householders.
Source: Annual Social and Economic Supplement to the Current Population Survey, 2007–2009.
Significantly different from estimate for unmarried partners (p < .05)