Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 16.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2012 May 2;31(8):1593–1606. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2012.2197406

TABLE I. Quantitative Comparison of Label Fusion Methods.

Number of classification errors when estimating the reference standard from experts with spatially varying performances. Comparison of three different methods: majority voting, regular STAPLE and local MAP STAPLE (L-ST) with three different half window sizes (HWS).

Fusion Method Majority Voting STAPLE L-ST (HWS 1) L-ST (HWS 4) L-ST (HWS 16)
# Errors 178 123 69 7 11