Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 7;4:283–301. doi: 10.2147/CLEP.S34285

Table 2.

Summary of calculated meta-relative risks (mRRs) for the seven prognostic factors of interest, including mRRs stratified by study size and annual patient volumea

Prognostic factor Number of studies Overall mRR (95% CI) P-valueb Number of studies mRR (95% CI) by study size P-value Number of studiesc mRR (95% CI) by patient volume per study center P-value
CEA level (≥200) 9 1.92 (1.14–3.22) <0.0001 <200: 4 <200: 2.49 (0.96–6.49) <200: 0.034 <20: 4 <20: 2.19 (1.64–2.9) <20: 0.616
≥200: 5 ≥200: 1.68 (0.90–3.14) ≥200: <0.0001 ≥20: 4 ≥20: 1.23 (0.51–2.96) ≥20: 0.001
Extrahepatic disease (yes vs no) 13 1.88 (1.50–2.37) <0.0001 <200: 3 <200: 2.43 (1.22–4.83) <200: <0.0001 <20: 5 <20: 2.35 (1.66–3.34) <20: 0.001
≥200: 10 ≥200: 1.74 (1.41–2.15) ≥200: 0.001 ≥20: 8 ≥20: 1.55 (1.28–1.88) ≥20: 0.032
Tumor grade (poor differentiation) 7 1.88 (1.32–2.67) <0.0001 <200: 3 <200: 2.88 (2.15–3.84) <200: 0.808 <20: 4 <20: 2.51 (1.91–3.29) <20: 0.356
≥200: 4 ≥200: 1.43 (1.15–1.78) ≥200: 0.195 ≥20: 2 ≥20: 1.65 (1.19–2.29) ≥20: 0.713
Positive resection margin (yes vs no) 20 2.02 (1.65–2.48) <0.0001 <200: 9 <200: 2.52 (1.73–3.66) <200: 0.044 <20: 10 <20: 2.53 (1.77–3.61) <20: 0.044
≥200: 11 ≥200: 1.82 (1.44–2.30) ≥200: <0.0001 ≥20: 10 ≥20: 1.79 (1.41–2.27) ≥20: <0.0001
1+ liver metastasesd 36 1.57 (1.39–1.78) <0.0001 <200: 17 <200: 1.74 (1.29–2.34) <200: <0.0001 <20: 16 <20: 1.46 (1.20–1.79) <20: <0.0001
≥200: 19 ≥200: 1.52 (1.34–1.71) ≥200: <0.0001 ≥20: 19 ≥20: 1.66 (1.40–1.96) ≥20: <0.0001
Node positive (yes vs no) 20 1.59 (1.46–1.73) 0.548 <200: 13 <200: 1.84 (1.55–2.19) <200: 0.626 <20: 13 <20: 1.64 (1.47–1.84) <20: 0.632
≥200: 7 ≥200: 1.52 (1.38–1.67) ≥200: 0.645 ≥20: 7 ≥20: 1.55 (1.33–1.79) ≥20: 0.309
.3 cm tumor diameter 20 1.52 (1.28–1.80) <0.0001 <200: 11 <200: 1.57 (1.24–1.98) <200: <0.0001 <20: 5 <20: 2.00 (1.51–2.64) <20: 0.058
≥200: 9 ≥200: 1.43 (1.24–1.64) ≥200: 0.754 ≥20: 13 ≥20: 1.32 (1.15–1.51) ≥20: <0.0001

Notes:

a

The estimated annual clinic volume was calculated as: initial patient population/number of years over which patients were recruited/number of centers participating in the study. Stratifications by study size and annual clinic volume were based on the median number of patients per center (n = 236) and median annual clinic volume (n = 21) of all studies included in the meta-analysis, thus the stratifications were performed using values of 200 (≥ and <) and 20 (≥ and <), respectively;

b

P-value is for heterogeneity of meta-analysis for all columns;

c

number of studies included in the analysis by patient volume not equal to total number of studies; data were not reported in some studies to calculate a patient volume;

d

includes variety of categories: “multiple” and various iterations of more than one metastasis.

Abbreviations: CEA, carcinoembryonic antigen; CI, confidence interval.