Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 12;28(22):2898–2904. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts553

Table 1.

Comparison of different approaches on the four SNPs identified in Nejentsev et al.’s article of which the first two SNPs within IFIH1 gene were replicated in their follow-up genotyping experiment

SNP Location Chr. Alleles P-value
Nejentsev’s Fisher’s Our Fisher’s Our EB1 Our EB2
rs35337543 IFIH1, intron 8 chr2 GInline graphicC 0.000044 0.0032 0.0029 0.016
rs35667974 IFIH1, exon 14 chr2 AInline graphicG 0.0049 0.076 0.017 0.011
ss107794688 CLEC16A, intron 23 chr16 CInline graphicT 0.016 0.045 0.0047 0.034
ss107794687 CLEC16A, intron 11 chr16 CInline graphicT 0.023 0.000046 0.00021 0.000005

Since different alignment software and filters were used, our Fisher’s exact results were slightly different from Nejentsev et al.rsquo;s. Overall, all the four SNPs still showed significance in our preferred EB2 model (Inline graphic).