Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 26;5:277–287. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S35272

Table 2.

Utilization of and rationale for hematology consultation

Specialty
Emergency medicine Geriatrics Internal medicine Rheumatology Critical care medicine Hematology ± oncology
Frequency of hematology consultationsa (%)
  Never 16 24 25 7 5
  1–2 times 46 35 41 11 30
  3–4 times 28 23 23 42 26
  5+ times 11 19 12 40 39
Frequency of consultations received from the emergency departmenta (%)
  Never 1
  1–2 times 32
  3–4 times 10
  5+ times 57
Reasons for hematology consultationb (%)
  Any coagulation study outside of normal ranges but not significantly abnormal 0 0 0 12 61
  Any significantly abnormal coagulation studies 34 55 54 42 85
  Combination of abnormal coagulation studies with clinical bleeding 87 78 78 65 88

Notes:

a

Survey participants were asked whether they had ever requested (or received) a hematology consultation for abnormal PT or aPTT in a patient with no history of bleeding diathesis or medications that affect coagulation.

b

Summated percentages may exceed 100% because of potential overlap among possible responses.

Abbreviations: aPTT, activated partial thromboplastin time; PT, prothrombin time.