Table 3. Environmental contamination with a colonizing or clinical infection strain and intra-household transmission by case-control status.
Case households | Control households | ||||||
(N = 146) | (N = 145) | ||||||
N | (%) | N | (%) | aORa | (95% CI) | P | |
Environmental contamination with a colonizing or clinical infection strain | |||||||
Contaminated with a colonizing strain or the clinical infection strain | 73 | (50) | 43 | (30) | 2.4 | (1.5–3.9) | <.01 |
Contaminated with a colonizing strain | 54 | (37) | 43 | (30) | 1.4 | (0.9–2.3) | .17 |
Contaminated with the clinical infection strain | 45 | (31) | |||||
Contaminated with a colonizing strain and the clinical infection strain | 26 | (18) | |||||
Intra-household transmission | |||||||
≥2 household members colonized with identical strains or ≥1non-index household member colonized with the clinical infection strain | 55 | (38) | 26 | (18) | 3.1 | (1.8–5.6) | <.01 |
≥2 household members colonized with identical strains | 35 | (24) | 26 | (18) | 1.5 | (0.8–2.8) | .17 |
≥1 non-index household member colonized with theclinical infection strain | 36 | (25) | |||||
≥2 household members colonized with identical strains and ≥1non-index household member colonized with the clinical infection strain | 16 | (11) |
Abbreviations: aOR, adjusted odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.
a. Logistic regression was used to calculate adjusted OR’s and 95% CI’s, controlling for household size.