. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 13.

Published in final edited form as: Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2011:199–203. doi: 10.1109/isbi.2011.5872387

Table 1.

Accuracy of the proposed method using various classifiers. Note that the automatic methods perform as well as the manual initialized FMM and better than the method in [5]

Variations of proposed method	Average F-measure
Gentle-Boost	0.8588
SVM-Linear kernel	0.8625
SVM-Quadratic kernel	0.7853
SVM-Polynomial kernel	0.8598
SVM-RBF kernel	0.8582
Other methods	Average F-measure
Manually Initialized FMM	0.8558
Method from [5]	0.7787