Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: Alcohol. 2012 Sep 1;46(8):747–755. doi: 10.1016/j.alcohol.2012.08.003

Figure 5. Alcohol substitution using operant procedures.

Figure 5

(A) Average (±S.E.M.) alcohol-appropriate responses from the two alcohol and water sessions that preceded testing are represented at the left of axis break. Dose-dependent substitution for the 1 g/kg alcohol dose was observed, demonstrating that the training procedures established reliable control of behavior. (B) Response rate (responses/min) did not vary by alcohol dose. * denotes significantly different from the 1 g/kg alcohol training dose (p<0.05).