Table A2.
Effect | Theme-last |
Theme-last: subject-verb |
Theme-last: verb-theme |
Theme-last: subject-verb: verb-theme |
||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region | t | p | t | p | t | p | t | p | ||||
Pre-subject | −0.01 | −0.1 | −0.02 | −0.8 | −0.04 | −1.5 | 0.04 | 0.7 | ||||
Pre-verb | −0.01 | −0.5 | 0.01 | 0.2 | 0.03 | 1.4 | 0.02 | 0.5 | ||||
Pre-theme | 0.22 | 12.2 | <0.0001 | 0.01 | 0.1 | −0.01 | −0.5 | −0.04 | −0.6 | |||
Pre-recipient | 0.20 | 9.9 | <0.0001 | 0.01 | 0.1 | −0.04 | −1.3 | 0.09 | 1.3 |
The only significant effects were found for the pre-theme and pre-recipient region. For both regions, speech rates were higher for the theme-last order, paralleling the effect found for fluency in the pre-recipient region (i.e., fewer disfluencies in the theme-last order). Bold indicates the significant effects.