Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 24;96(6):1252–1261. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.039990

TABLE 3.

Multivariable-adjusted associations of fatty acid patterns with 14-y risks of coronary heart disease and stroke in the Cardiovascular Health Study (n = 2972)1

Quintile of each fatty acid pattern score
1 2 3 4 5 P-trend
Ischemic heart disease incidence
 trans Fatty acid pattern
 Cases (rate/1000 person-years) 98 (15.1) 112 (17) 105 (15.6) 96 (14.3) 101 (15.4)
 Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)2 1.0 (reference) 1.14 (0.81, 1.58) 1.02 (0.71, 1.46) 1.02 (0.70, 1.48) 1.04 (0.72, 1.50) 0.93
 + corrected for regression-dilution bias3 1.0 (reference) 1.04 (0.54, 2.00) 1.00 (0.49, 2.05) 1.01 (0.49, 2.08) 1.01 (0.49, 2.08) 0.99
 De novo lipogenesis pattern
 Cases (rate/1000 person-years) 89 (13.6) 100 (14.6) 106 (16.1) 122 (18.5) 95 (14.5)
 Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)2 1.0 (reference) 0.99 (0.70, 1.41) 1.07 (0.77, 1.50) 1.19 (0.85, 1.66) 1.08 (0.76, 1.53) 0.48
 + Corrected for regression-dilution bias3 1.0 (reference) 0.98 (0.53, 1.84) 1.14 (0.63, 2.09) 1.40 (0.76, 2.57) 1.16 (0.62, 2.16) 0.43
 LCMUFA pattern
 Cases (rate/1000 person-years) 87 (12.5) 92 (13.4) 98 (14.6) 97 (15.2) 138 (22.3)
 Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)2 1.0 (reference) 0.98 (0.69, 1.37) 0.89 (0.61, 1.28) 1.08 (0.75, 1.57) 1.34 (0.93, 1.93) 0.06
 + Corrected for regression-dilution bias3 1.0 (reference) 0.94 (0.42, 2.12) 0.75 (0.31, 1.78) 1.21 (0.51, 2.89) 1.99 (0.84, 4.74) 0.06
Stroke incidence
 trans Fatty acid pattern
 Cases (rate/1000 person-years) 56 (8.6) 61 (9.0) 60 (8.8) 75 (11.2) 94 (14.4)
 Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)2 1.0 (reference) 1.52 (0.97, 2.40) 1.39 (0.90, 2.16) 1.70 (1.08, 2.67) 2.22 (1.41, 3.48) 0.001
 + Corrected for regression-dilution bias3 1.0 (reference) 2.28 (0.94, 5.54) 1.91 (0.81, 4.51) 2.81 (1.16, 6.82) 4.74 (1.95, 11.5) 0.001
 De novo lipogenesis pattern
 Cases (rate/1000 person-years) 67 (10.2) 70 (10.3) 66 (9.9) 66 (9.8) 77 (11.7)
 Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)2 1.0 (reference) 1.11 (0.72, 1.71) 0.77 (0.48, 1.23) 0.80 (0.51, 1.26) 1.31 (0.85, 2.01) 0.33
 + Corrected for regression-dilution bias3 1.0 (reference) 1.19 (0.55, 2.58) 0.64 (0.28, 1.46) 0.68 (0.31, 1.53) 1.59 (0.74, 3.42) 0.34
 LCMUFA pattern
 Cases (rate/1000 person-years) 74 (10.7) 56 (8.2) 64 (9.5) 90 (14.2) 62 (9.6)
 Multivariable-adjusted HR (95% CI)2 1.0 (reference) 0.93 (0.62, 1.39) 0.91 (0.60, 1.39) 1.27 (0.84, 1.90) 1.08 (0.70, 1.68) 0.41
 + Corrected for regression-dilution bias3 1.0 (reference) 0.90 (0.35, 2.32) 0.88 (0.33, 2.34) 1.41 (0.54, 3.69) 1.12 (0.40, 3.15) 0.61
1

LCMUFA, long-chain MUFA.

2

Values were derived by Cox regression analysis. The model was adjusted for age, sex, race (white or nonwhite), education (<high school, high school graduate, college graduate, or >college), smoking status (never, former, or current), exercise intensity (no exercise, low, moderate, or high), leisure-time physical activity (kcal/wk), 3-y weight change (kg), prevalent diabetes (yes or no), treated hypertension (yes or no), alcohol intake (tertile categories), total energy intake (kcal/d), and food consumptions (fish, high-fat dairy products, margarine, sweets, nuts, fried products, meats, and processed meats; servings/wk each). The 3 patterns were also mutually adjusted.

3

Regression calibration was applied to correct the estimates for bias as a result of temporal variation of the exposures (3 fatty acid patterns) and selected covariates (physical activity and dietary consumptions) after no significant nonlinear association was confirmed. The assumption of a linear association was met for each association (P-nonlinearity > 0.10) according to restricted cubic spline analyses that allowed a test for a nonlinear association.