Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;7(11):e49330. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049330

Table 1. ANOVA summary.

Treatment
Compound Control LB+ LB− F a,b
β-caryophyllene 5.601 a 15.901 b 16.161 b 8.345**
α-caryophyllene 2.659 a 14.160 b 14.1495 a 17.408***
β-sesquiphellandrene 1.78−15 a 13.901 b 11.672 b 19.161***
[Z]-β-farnesene 2.769 a 14.494 b 12.181 b 6.577*
β-cubebene 2.771 a 14.463 b 12.012 b 6.594*
germacrene-D-4-ol 5.388 a 14.758 b 14.712 b 7.557**
3-hexen-1-ol 4.44−16 5.368 6.188 1.343
cyclohexene 2.770 a 14.717 b 12.273 b 6.741*
caryophyllene oxide 1.70−15 a 14.591 b 15.020 b 342.890****
nonanal 5.176 a 14.941 b 14.987 b 9.464**
a

df = 2, 12;

b

*P<0.05, ** P<0.01, ***P<0.001, ****P<0.0001.

Tabulated mean differences in total ion chromatograms for ten volatile compounds extracted from the headspace emissions of S. tuberosum. Values are log-transformed ion chromatograms (peak areas), and lettering shows Tukey's HSD test for each row.