Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;7(11):e49824. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049824

Table 1. The general linear models (GLMs) that explained the greatest percentages of between-site variance in each plant community metric.

Plant community metric Phase of plant growth cycle F P R2(adj) Equation
Plant biomass Growth n/a
Peak 8.89 0.008 28.3%  =  (713.00 (±197.80) + (−8.56 (±1.04) · Shade)
Recession 5.92 0.011 34.1%  = 498.44 (±94.91) + (−1.87 (±0.59) · SwanBD) + (−9.47 (±3.76) · Shade)
Plant cover Growth n/a
Peak 44.58 <0.001 91.6%  =  (−11.32 (±4.41) · SwanBD) + (1.84 (±2.73) · Temp) + (6.97 (±2.14) · Dist) + (0.78 (±0.31) · (SwanBD · Temp)) + (−0.46 (±0.15) · (Temp · Dist))
Recession 14.12 <0.001 58.0%  = 65.29 (±10.61) + (−0.18 (0.04) · SwanBD) + (−1.01 (±0.24) · Shade)
R. pseudofluitans flowering 5.74 0.028 20.0%  = 47.27 (±8.99) + (−0.21 (±0.09) · SwanBD)
R. pseudofluitans dominance Growth n/a
Peak 4.14 0.024 33.1%  = 3526.86 (±1262.91) + (−234.48 (±87.65) · Temp) + (−31.23 (±10.82) · Dist) + (2.12 (±0.75) · (Temp · Dist))
Recession 7.46 0.002 50.5%  = 4694.43 (±1350.60) + (−314.00 (±93.36) · Temp) + (−42.61 (±11.68) · Dist) + (2.89 (±0.81) · (Temp · Dist))
Plant species richness Growth n/a
Peak 5.35 0.010 40.7%  =  −220.61 (±100.92) + (14.95 (±7.00) · Temp) + (2.00 (±0.87) · Dist) + (−0.13 (±0.06) · (Temp · Dist))
Recession 238.97 <0.001 92.2%  = 0.05 (±0.01) · Dist
Plant species evenness Growth n/a
Peak 6.00 0.025 20.8%  = 0.30 (±0.07) + (0.002 (±0.001) · SwanBD)
Recession 5.19 0.011 39.8%  =  −47.33 (±13.83) + (3.27 (±0.96) · Temp) + (0.43 (±0.12) · Dist) + (−0.03 (±0.01) · (Temp · Dist))

The relevant mean (± SE) parameter values for swan biomass density (SwanBD), shading (Shade), water temperature (Temp) and distance downstream of source (Dist), are given for each equation; n/a indicates that no statistically significant model was detected.