Table 1. The general linear models (GLMs) that explained the greatest percentages of between-site variance in each plant community metric.
Plant community metric | Phase of plant growth cycle | F | P | R2(adj) | Equation |
Plant biomass | Growth | – | – | – | n/a |
Peak | 8.89 | 0.008 | 28.3% | = (713.00 (±197.80) + (−8.56 (±1.04) · Shade) | |
Recession | 5.92 | 0.011 | 34.1% | = 498.44 (±94.91) + (−1.87 (±0.59) · SwanBD) + (−9.47 (±3.76) · Shade) | |
Plant cover | Growth | – | – | – | n/a |
Peak | 44.58 | <0.001 | 91.6% | = (−11.32 (±4.41) · SwanBD) + (1.84 (±2.73) · Temp) + (6.97 (±2.14) · Dist) + (0.78 (±0.31) · (SwanBD · Temp)) + (−0.46 (±0.15) · (Temp · Dist)) | |
Recession | 14.12 | <0.001 | 58.0% | = 65.29 (±10.61) + (−0.18 (0.04) · SwanBD) + (−1.01 (±0.24) · Shade) | |
R. pseudofluitans flowering | – | 5.74 | 0.028 | 20.0% | = 47.27 (±8.99) + (−0.21 (±0.09) · SwanBD) |
R. pseudofluitans dominance | Growth | – | – | – | n/a |
Peak | 4.14 | 0.024 | 33.1% | = 3526.86 (±1262.91) + (−234.48 (±87.65) · Temp) + (−31.23 (±10.82) · Dist) + (2.12 (±0.75) · (Temp · Dist)) | |
Recession | 7.46 | 0.002 | 50.5% | = 4694.43 (±1350.60) + (−314.00 (±93.36) · Temp) + (−42.61 (±11.68) · Dist) + (2.89 (±0.81) · (Temp · Dist)) | |
Plant species richness | Growth | – | – | – | n/a |
Peak | 5.35 | 0.010 | 40.7% | = −220.61 (±100.92) + (14.95 (±7.00) · Temp) + (2.00 (±0.87) · Dist) + (−0.13 (±0.06) · (Temp · Dist)) | |
Recession | 238.97 | <0.001 | 92.2% | = 0.05 (±0.01) · Dist | |
Plant species evenness | Growth | – | – | – | n/a |
Peak | 6.00 | 0.025 | 20.8% | = 0.30 (±0.07) + (0.002 (±0.001) · SwanBD) | |
Recession | 5.19 | 0.011 | 39.8% | = −47.33 (±13.83) + (3.27 (±0.96) · Temp) + (0.43 (±0.12) · Dist) + (−0.03 (±0.01) · (Temp · Dist)) |
The relevant mean (± SE) parameter values for swan biomass density (SwanBD), shading (Shade), water temperature (Temp) and distance downstream of source (Dist), are given for each equation; n/a indicates that no statistically significant model was detected.