Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 14;7(11):e49659. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049659

Table 3. Parameter estimates and details of the most competitive models of Table 2, depicting the relationship between the route length (1) or migration speed (2) of 36 satellite-tagged Black Kites and Device Type (Argos vs GPS) and data filtering Approach (Approach 1–4).

Most competitive model Parameter estimate ± SE t-value P
(1) Response variable: route length (km)
Device Type 518.7±93.5 5.0 <0.0001
Approach 2 −300.9±93.5 −4.5 <0.0001
Approach 3 −289.8±93.5 −3.9 0.0001
Approach 4 −454.9±93.5 −6.5 <0.0001
Device Type *Approach 2 198.8±132.2 2.6 0.0112
Device Type *Approach 3 −381.4±132.2 −2.2 0.0307
Device Type * Approach 4 −354.2±132.2 −1.7 0.0883
Intercept 2694.9±132.2 302.9 <0.0001
(2) Response variable: migration speed (km d−1)
Device Type 82.1±10.6 7.3 <0.0001
Approach2 −30.9±10.6 −3.8 0.0002
Approach3 −32.4±10.6 −3.4 0.0009
Approach4 −45.2±10.6 −5.4 <0.0001
Device Type * Approach 2 28.2±15.0 2.6 0.0108
Device Type * Approach 3 −33.1±15.0 −1.5 0.1321
Device Type * Approach 4 −35.1±15.0 −1.2 0.2502
Intercept 256.4±15.0 142.5 <0.0001