Table 3. Parameter estimates and details of the most competitive models of Table 2, depicting the relationship between the route length (1) or migration speed (2) of 36 satellite-tagged Black Kites and Device Type (Argos vs GPS) and data filtering Approach (Approach 1–4).
Most competitive model | Parameter estimate ± SE | t-value | P |
(1) Response variable: route length (km) | |||
Device Type | 518.7±93.5 | 5.0 | <0.0001 |
Approach 2 | −300.9±93.5 | −4.5 | <0.0001 |
Approach 3 | −289.8±93.5 | −3.9 | 0.0001 |
Approach 4 | −454.9±93.5 | −6.5 | <0.0001 |
Device Type *Approach 2 | 198.8±132.2 | 2.6 | 0.0112 |
Device Type *Approach 3 | −381.4±132.2 | −2.2 | 0.0307 |
Device Type * Approach 4 | −354.2±132.2 | −1.7 | 0.0883 |
Intercept | 2694.9±132.2 | 302.9 | <0.0001 |
(2) Response variable: migration speed (km d−1) | |||
Device Type | 82.1±10.6 | 7.3 | <0.0001 |
Approach2 | −30.9±10.6 | −3.8 | 0.0002 |
Approach3 | −32.4±10.6 | −3.4 | 0.0009 |
Approach4 | −45.2±10.6 | −5.4 | <0.0001 |
Device Type * Approach 2 | 28.2±15.0 | 2.6 | 0.0108 |
Device Type * Approach 3 | −33.1±15.0 | −1.5 | 0.1321 |
Device Type * Approach 4 | −35.1±15.0 | −1.2 | 0.2502 |
Intercept | 256.4±15.0 | 142.5 | <0.0001 |