Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct;3(5):141–162. doi: 10.1177/2042018812458697

Table 2.

Original articles on behavioural physical health interventions in schizophrenia.

Authors and year Country Design Study group (N) Control group (N) Diagnoses Intervention Target Length of intervention Effectiveness
Sletten et al. [1967] USA Experimental, crossover 14 SCZ Calorie restriction Weight reduction 8 weeks Yes
Harmatz and Lapuc [1968] USA Experimental randomised 21 SCZ (a) Diet versus (b) group therapy versus (c) behavioural modification Weight reduction 10 weeks No (a), Yes (b, c)
Rotatori et al. [1980] USA Experimental 7 7 SMI Counselling, tokens, self-reinforcement Weight reduction 14 weeks Not significantly
Lukoff et al. [1986] USA Naturalistic 28 SCZ Holistic programme, including stress reduction Physical health, cardiovascular fitness 10 weeks Possibly
Mcdougall [1992] UK Naturalistic 11 SCZ Nutritional education Weight reduction, eating behaviour 8 weeks No
Pelham et al. [1993] Canada Naturalistic 11 SCZ Exercise Physical health, cardiovascular fitness 8 weeks Yes
Merriman et al. [1995] UK Naturalistic 6 SMI Diet, exercise, self-assertiveness training Weight reduction 12 weeks Not significantly
Roll et al. [1998] USA Experimental, crossover, ABA design 11 SCZ, SCZA Monetary reinforcement Smoking cessation/reduction 3 weeks Yes (abstinence, reduction)
Aquila and Emanuel [2000] USA Retrospective 32 SCZ, SCZA Low-fat/calorie diet, nutritional education Weight reduction 18 months Yes, partially
Ball et al. [2001] USA Experimental 11 11 SMI Weight Watchers programme Weight reduction 10 weeks Yes, for men only
Cohen et al. [2001] USA Retrospective chart review 39 Mental retardation Calorie restriction Weight reduction 2 years No
Umbricht et al. [2001] Switzerland Naturalistic 10 SCZ CBT, group and individual Weight reduction 6 weeks Yes
Feeney et al. [2003] Ireland Experimental 9 42 SCZ Weight management programme Weight reduction 3 years Yes
Littrell et al. [2003] USA RCT 35 35 SCZ, SCZA Psycho-education (wellbeing) versus standard care Weight reduction 6 months Yes (attenuated weight gain)
O’Keefe et al. [2003] USA Naturalistic, retrospective chart review 35 SMI Dietician input, self-directed diet as part of the treatment plan Weight reduction 84 ± 21 months Yes
Vreeland et al. [2003] USA Experimental 31 15 SCZ, SCZA Nutritional education, exercise, motivational counselling Weight reduction 12 weeks Yes
Menza et al. [2004] USA Experimental 31 20 SCZ, SCZA Nutritional education, exercise, behavioural strategies Weight reduction 52 weeks Yes
Ohlsen et al. [2004] UK Naturalistic 44 SCZ, SCZA Weight management programme Weight reduction 1 year Not significantly
Beebe et al. [2005] USA Experimental 6 4 SCZ Walking group Weight reduction 16 weeks Yes
Brar et al. [2005] USA Experimental, open label, rater blinded, randomized 34 37 SCZ, SCZA Group behavioural treatment Weight reduction 14 weeks Yes
Evans et al. [2005] Australia RCT 29 22 SCZ, SCZA Individual nutritional education + OLZ versus OLZ Weight reduction 3 months Yes (attenuated weight gain)
Fogarty and Happell [2005] Australia Naturalistic, quantitative 6 SCZ Structured exercise programme Physical health, cardiovascular fitness 3 months Yes
Kalarchian et al. [2005] USA Naturalistic, chart review 35 SCZ Behavioural weight control programme Weight reduction 12 weeks Yes, sustained
McCreadie et al. [2005] UK RCT 67 24 SCZ Provision of fruit and vegetables ± nutritional education Diet 6 months Yes, but not sustainable
Skrinar et al. [2005] USA RCT 10 10 SMI Exercise Weight reduction 12 weeks Not significantly
Alvarez-Jimenez et al. [2006] Spain RCT 28 33 SMI (FE) Early behavioural intervention + OLZ/RISP/HAL versus OLZ/RISP/HAL Weight reduction 3 months Yes (attenuated weight gain)
Baker et al. [2006] Australia RCT 147 151 SMI Motivational interviewing + CBT + NR versus NR Smoking cessation/reduction 12 months Yes (reduction, discontinuation), No (abstinence)
Brown and Chan [2006] UK RCT 15 13 SMI Health promoting intervention Weight reduction 6 weeks Yes
Kwon et al. [2006] S. Korea RCT 33 15 SCZ, SCZA Weight management + OLZ versus OLZ Weight reduction 12 weeks Yes
McKibbin et al. [2006] USA RCT 28 29 SCZ, SCZA DART versus TAU Weight reduction 24 weeks Yes
Scocco et al. [2006] Italy Naturalistic 20 SCZ, SCZA Psycho-education at an early and late phase of OLZ treatment Weight reduction 24 weeks Yes (attenuated weight gain in late intervention)
Weber and Wyne [2006] USA RCT 8 9 SCZ, SCZA CBT versus TAU Weight reduction 16 weeks Yes
Khazaal et al. [2007] Switzerland RCT 31 30 SCZ, SCZA CBT versus brief nutritional education Weight reduction 12 weeks Yes
Pendlebury et al. [2007] UK Naturalistic 93 SMI Behavioural treatment programme Weight reduction 4 years Yes (increasing dropouts)
Poulin et al. [2007] Canada Naturalistic 59 51 SCZ, SCZA Weight control programme Weight reduction 18 months Yes
Smith et al. [2007] UK Naturalistic 966 SMI Wellbeing support programme (6 consultations) Weight reduction 2 years Yes
Wu et al. [2007] Taiwan Experimental 28 25 SCZ Low-calorie diet, exercise + CLOZ versus CLOZ Weight reduction 6 months Yes
Chafetz et al. [2008] USA RCT 90 109 SMI Wellbeing training versus TAU Physical health 12 months Yes (self-reported health status)
Forsberg et al. [2008] Sweden RCT 24 17 SMI Healthy living programme versus TAU Weight reduction 12 months Not significantly, yes for MetS prevalence
Lindenmayer et al. [2009] USA Naturalistic 275 SCZ, SCZA Structured wellbeing programme Weight reduction 36 weeks Yes
Beebe et al. [2011] USA RCT 48 49 SCZ, SCZA Motivational intervention Physical exercise attendance 16 weeks Yes
Eldridge et al. [2011] UK Naturalistic 159 SMI Wellbeing support programme Physical health 9–12 months Yes (blood pressure, BMI)

BMI, body mass index; CBT, cognitive behavioural therapy; CLOZ, clozapine; DART, diabetes awareness rehabilitation training; FE, first episode; HAL, haloperidol; NR, nicotine replacement; OLZ, olanzapine; RCT, randomized controlled trial; RISP, risperidone; SCZ, schizophrenia; SCZA, schizoaffective disorder; SMI, serious mental illness; TAU: treatment as usual.