Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 16;3:401. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00401

Table 2.

Results of the overall ANOVAs comparing ERPs to think versus no-think conditions in the selected time windows.

Time window
T/nt
T/nt × Anterior/posterior
T/nt × Hemisphere
T/nt × Anterior/posterior × Hemisphere
ms F(1, 21) p F(5, 105) p F(2, 42) p F(10, 210) p
100–140 14.915 0.001 3.3 ns <1 ns 1.271 ns
175–225 8.032 0.01 4.244 0.04 2.501 ns 1.203 ns
225–250 <1 ns 12.756 <0.001 1.279 ns <1 ns
300–350 6.142 0.022 8.22 0.003 3.462 0.041 2.141 ns
450–500 6.18 0.021 2.64 ns <1 ns <1 ns
500–600 3.386 ns 3.56 0.035 <1 ns 1.515 ns
650–900 2.027 ns 11.794 <0.001 3.294 0.047 2.890 0.022
1400–1800 4.927 0.038 1.243 ns 3.098 ns 2.335 ns

α < 0.05; see Section “Think Versus No-think ERP Effects” and Figure 2 for direction of effects.