Skip to main content
. 2010 Dec 8;29(1):95–108. doi: 10.1093/imammb/dqq023

Table 3.

Rankings with respect to TI for parameter amplification ([1.1–2, 3–10]-fold of each parameter’s reference value)

Rankings Parameter Variation TI Cell number Simulation step
Group I
1 ERK 1.1 0.1843 13682 222
2 TGFβR 3 0.1756 13828 222
3 Ras 4 0.0161 16503 222
4 PKC 2 0.0024 16732 222
Group II
1 PLCγ 6 0.7395 214 167
2 EGFR 10 0.7111 766 168
3 MEK 10 0.4678 5829 181
4 ERK 1.2 0.2518 11417 207
5 TGFβR 10 0.184 13535 220
6 Raf 3 0.0253 16198 220
7 PKC 1.2–1.3 − 0.0001 16775 222