Skip to main content
. 2012 May 17;129(1):166–173. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs183

TABLE 3.

Logistic Regression Model for Significant Variations, DA+ Versus DA Groups

Model term Estimate, β S.E. χ 2 OR (95% CI) p valuea
Intercept 0.5762 0.4565 1.59 0.207
SOD2 (rs4880) 0.4965 0.1706 8.47 2.70 (1.38, 5.27) 0.004
GSTT1 0.1373 0.3246 0.18 1.32 (0.37, 4.70) 0.672
GSTM1 −0.3736 0.1884 3.73 0.47 (0.23, 0.99) 0.047
EPHX1 (rs1091588) 0.1428 0.1968 0.53 1.33 (0.62, 2.88) 0.468
GSTP1 (rs762803) 0.9037 0.3925 5.30 6.10 (1.31, 28.4) 0.021
EPHX1 (rs2854450) −0.8415 0.2456 11.7 0.19 (0.07, 0.49) <0.001
EPHX1 (rs2740168) 0.0863 0.2687 0.10 1.19 (0.41, 3.41) 0.748
EPHX1 (rs1051741) −0.6720 0.4799 1.396 0.26 (0.04, 1.71) 0.161
EPHX1 (rs2740171) 0.1777 0.1604 1.23 1.43 (0.76, 2.68) 0.268
GSTT1*GSTP1 (rs762803) −0.9071 0.4091 4.92 0.16 (0.03, 0.81) 0.027
GSTM1*EPHX1 (rs2854450) 0.9970 0.3269 9.30 7.34 (2.04, 26.5) 0.002
EPHX1 (rs2740168)*EPHX1 (rs1051741) 1.0729 0.5361 4.00 8.55 (1.05, 69.9) 0.045
GSTP1 (rs762803)*EPHX1 (rs2740168) −0.6212 0.3085 4.05 0.29 (0.09, 0.97) 0.044

aAdjusted for smoking status and type of exposure (HDI vs. MDI or TDI).