Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 11;12:176. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-176

Table 4.

Estimates of genetic diversity for sampled lineages within Melanohalea

Taxon N H Hd S π Tajima'sD Fu and Li'sFs Fs RI SSD
Melanohalea (total)
487
146
0.956
142
0.0481
-
-
-
-
-
M. elegantula*
100
16
0.478
15
0.0017
−2.1366
−3.0108
−17.149
0.09731746
1.82E-05
M. elegantula Spain
1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
M. exasperata
11
8
0.927
21
0.0140
−0.9720
−1.3005
−1.144
0.11438
0.031023
M. exasperata Spain
2
2
1
9
0.0224
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
M. exasperatula*
105
13
0.756
17
0.0039
−1.5449
−1.9654
−4.29
0.068649
0.012024
M. gomukhensis
2
1
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
M. halei
4
1
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
M. infumata
11
3
0.564
2
0.0017
0.0362
−0.2696
−0.113
0.094215
0.000715
M. laciniatula
16
5
0.833
3
0.0032
1.2695
1.2620
−0.768
0.156667
0.023146
M. lobulata
3
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
M. multispora 1
14
2
0.143
1
0.0004
−1.1552
−1.5139
−0.595
0.168216
0.005273
M. multispora 2
2
2
1
1
0.0024
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
M. multispora 3*
26
15
0.911
31
0.0150
−1.0675
−0.7554
−3.234
0.015233
0.007078
M. olivacea*
34
24
0.959
26
0.0092
−1.5576
−2.6561
−19.249
0.018858
0.000997
M. olivaceoides 1
8
1
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
M. olivaceoides 2
2
1
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
M. poeltii
3
2
0.667
3
0.0050
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
M. septentrionalis*
31
9
0.501
16
0.0048
−1.7399
−2.4269
−2.221
0.169296
0.304035
M. subelegantula
10
3
0.378
5
0.0025
−1.7411
−2.1790
0.477
0.285432
0.039008
M. subexasperata
2
2
1
7
0.0141
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
M. subolivacea 1
9
7
0.917
15
0.0100
−0.4538
−0.7083
−1.23
0.110969
0.046933
M. subolivacea 2*
76
43
0.945
30
0.0107
−0.9541
−2.2016
−20.111
0.008245
0.00313
M. trabeculata
10
3
0.6
5
0.0056
0.8301
0.7679
2.146
0.102222
0.043291
M. ushuaiensis Argentina
1
1
0
0
0
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
M. ushuaiensis Chile 2 2 1 3 0.0075 NA NA NA NA NA

n = sample size, h = number of haplotypes, Hd = haplotypic diversity, S = number of segregating (polymorphic) sites, π = nucleotide diversity, Fs = Fu’s F statistic, RI = raggedness index, SSD = sum of squared deviations. Bolded values indicate significant Tajima D, Fu’s F statistic, RI and SSD values.