Skip to main content
. 2012 May 29;5:263. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-263

Table 2.

DNA damage in the exposed subjects with different genotypes of polymorphisms

SNP genotype n Olive tail moment
Tail length
Tail DNA%
Median P25-P75 Median P25-P75 Median P25-P75
XRCC1 Arg399Gln
GG
70
0.93
0.58–1.79
9.74
6.89–18.14
3.25
1.94–5.58
GA
42
0.73
0.46–1.35
8.19
5.93–13.79
2.50
1.77–4.36
AA
8
0.50
0.43–0.93
6.64
5.00–9.92
1.91
1.43–3.03
 
P*
 
0.048
0.050
0.039
 
AA + GA
50
0.66
0.44–1.31
8.00
5.69–13.74
2.32
1.66–4.33
 
P
 
0.043
0.067
0.046
XRCC1 Arg194Trp
CC
66
0.75
0.47–1.45
8.55
6.30–14.22
2.82
1.66–4.85
CT
49
0.91
0.48–1.49
9.69
6.97–16.25
3.22
1.83–4.75
TT
5
0.66
0.37–1.82
7.67
5.11–16.94
2.39
1.29–5.84
 
P*
 
0.973
0.964
0.992
OGG1 Ser326Cys
CC
18
1.09
0.41–1.84
11.72
4.92–18.87
3.63
1.55–5.80
CG
56
0.86
0.47–1.46
9.18
6.50–15.53
3.07
1.73–4.86
GG
41
0.78
0.56–1.19
8.93
6.87–12.07
2.69
2.02–4.15
 
P*
 
0.462
0.335
0.377
ERCC1 C8092A
CC
20
0.84
0.45–1.38
9.79
6.56–15.53
3.20
1.77–4.72
CA
47
0.71
0.47–1.43
8.10
5.81–14.10
2.45
1.61–4.53
AA
49
0.92
0.62–1.60
9.66
7.21–17.29
3.22
2.06–5.50
 
P*
 
0.543
0.690
0.595
ERCC5 His1104Asp
GG
25
0.92
0.62–1.60
9.66
7.21–17.29
3.22
2.06–5.50
GC
61
0.84
0.54–1.50
9.66
6.79–15.88
2.84
1.99–4.99
CC
30
0.83
0.50–1.38
9.21
7.01–15.05
3.04
1.81–4.59
 
P*
 
0.886
0.931
0.920
ERCC6 Gly399Asp
CC
32
0.83
0.49–1.14
8.90
6.82–11.70
3.03
1.87–3.97
CT
54
0.75
0.48–1.73
8.26
6.42–16.12
2.75
1.85–5.51
TT
31
1.03
0.48–1.57
10.70
5.72–18.10
3.22
1.68–5.19
 
P*
 
0.143
0.152
0.203
XPD Lys751Gln
AA
94
0.82
0.48–1.45
9.50
6.42–14.84
2.94
1.81–4.80
AC
20
0.81
0.48–1.81
8.79
7.00–16.74
2.88
1.88–5.81
CC
0
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
P*
 
0.771
0.742
0.900
XPC Lys939Gln
GG
45
0.89
0.56–1.52
9.66
6.97–15.96
2.96
2.02–5.14
GT
53
0.83
0.47–1.40
8.87
6.63–14.07
2.75
1.39–6.13
TT
18
0.81
0.39–2.10
9.13
5.68–23.00
2.92
1.73–4.57
 
P*
 
0.564
0.379
0.705
GSTP1 Ile105Val
AA
80
0.83
0.52–1.58
9.21
6.75–15.65
2.94
1.85–5.30
AG
30
0.70
0.38–1.41
8.03
5.71–15.29
2.41
1.62–4.53
GG
6
1.02
0.71–1.84
11.89
8.83–18.95
3.74
2.46–5.83
  P*   0.169 0.514 0.463

* The DNA damage data was square root-transformed and multivariable linear model was used after adjusting confounding factors of gender, age, smoking status, drinking and exposure time of chromium.

Comparing the subjects with GG genotype with AA + GA.

∫ Owing to missing detect in DNA damage and genotype, the numbers of subjects in Table  2 were less 157 in exposed group.