Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov;85(1019):e1120–e1126. doi: 10.1259/bjr/20976707

Table 4. Comparison with published studies.

Study Patient number (nodal stage) Median follow-up (months) Median time to PET/CT post chemoradiation (months) Negative predictive value (%) Positive predictive value (%)
This study 92 (N0–N3) 19 3 (range 2–8) 91.8 54.8
63 (N2A–3) 87.9 23.8
Loo et al7 34 (N2A–2C) 39.1 3 100
Tan et al8 48 (N2A–3) 20 2.5 (range 1.1–5.3) 95 20
Yao et al9 188 (N2A–3) 36.2 3.8 (range 1.3–10.9) 99 (neck) 4371 (neck)
98.7 (primary) 32.4 (primary)
Ong et al10 65 (N1–3) 43 3 (range 2–6.75) 97 38
Abgral et al11 91 (N0-3) 11.5 11.6 (range 7.2–16) 100 77
Nayak et al12 43 (N2A–3) 18.1 Within 6 months 97 70
Gupta et al13 57 (N0–2B) 26 2.25 (range 1.25–7.25) 86.7 58.3

PET, positron emission tomography.