Table 1.
This table summarizes subjects’ performance.
| Accuracy (%) | Number of subjects performing at specified accuracy |
Percentage of people after training | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run 1 | Run 2 | Run 3 | Run 4 | ||
| 100 | 22 | 25 | 27 | 27 | 50.9 |
| 90–99 | 14 | 19 | 19 | 19 | 35.8 |
| 80–89 | 7 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 9.4 |
| 70–79 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1.9 |
| 60–69 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1.9 |
| 50–59 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 40–49 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 |
| 0–39 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Mean accuracy | 87.9 | 92.9 | 95.0 | 95.5 | |
| N = 53 | N = 53 with 14 new | N = 53 with 7 new | N = 53 with 2 new | ||
The accuracies presented in each cell reflect the highest accuracy the subject attained. Since most subjects performed only one run, most of the results reflect performance after one run. The bottom row reflects the number of subjects who participated in at least the specified number of runs. For example, 53 subjects participated in at least one run, while seven subjects participated in at least three runs.