Table 2.
Cumulative logit model analysis of cognitive status and lipids/lipoproteinsa
| β | SE | Wald χ2 | OR (95% CI) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TG | ||||
| Unadjusted | −0.11 | 0.11 | 0.82 | 0.9 (0.72–1.13) |
| Model 1 | −0.41 | 0.13 | 9.91 | 0.67 (0.52–0.86)** |
| Model 2 | −0.43 | 0.13 | 10.62 | 0.65 (0.50–0.84)** |
| TC | ||||
| Unadjusted | 0.19 | 0.06 | 8.76 | 1.21 (1.07–1.37)* |
| Model 1 | −0.09 | 0.07 | 1.72 | 0.91 (0.79–1.05) |
| Model 2 | −0.08 | 0.07 | 1.11 | 0.93 (0.80–1.07) |
| HDL | ||||
| Unadjusted | 0.97 | 0.21 | 21.22 | 2.65 (1.75–4.01)** |
| Model 1 | 0.12 | 0.23 | 0.25 | 1.12 (0.71–1.77) |
| Model 2 | 0.19 | 0.24 | 0.62 | 1.21 (0.76–1.92) |
| LDL | ||||
| Unadjusted | 0.12 | 0.08 | 1.83 | 1.12 (0.95–1.33) |
| Model 1 | −0.04 | 0.09 | 0.16 | 0.96 (0.81–1.15) |
| Model 2 | −0.02 | 0.09 | 0.04 | 0.98 (0.82–1.18) |
aCognitive status was separated into four groups (none, mild, moderate or severe impairment), and β indicate the coefficient derived from the cumulative logit model, SE is the standard error of β. Model 1 adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity and education; Model 2 adjusted for age, sex, ethnicity, education, smoking, drinking, leisure activities and systolic blood pressure.
*P < 0.05.
**P < 0.01.