Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 19.
Published in final edited form as: Gut. 2010 Nov 10;60(1):66–72. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.208074

Table 3.

Age-adjusted odds ratios for prevalent colorectal adenoma at specific anatomic locations by quintile of tissue folate concentration among 813 women in the CONCeRN Study.

OR (95% CI)1

Q1
< 0.442
µg/g wet tissue
Q2
0.442–0.679
µg/g wet tissue
Q3
0.680–0.917
µg/g wet tissue
Q4
0.918–1.261
µg/g wet tissue
Q5
≥ 1.262 µg/g
wet tissue
p trend
Distal adenoma (N=60 cases)2
      Cases 11 10 11 15 13
      OR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.85 (0.35–2.07) 0.86 (0.36–2.07) 1.19 (0.53–2.72) 1.01 (0.43–2.37) 0.61
Proximal adenoma (N=95 cases)2
      Cases 26 21 15 15 18
      OR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.75 (0.40–1.42) 0.48 (0.24–0.96) 0.49 (0.24–0.97) 0.56 (0.29–1.09) 0.11
Both proximal and distal adenoma (N=15 cases)2
      Cases 3 2 4 4 2
      OR (95% CI) 1.00 (reference) 0.63 (0.10–3.87) 1.05 (0.23–4.85) 1.02 (0.22–4.74) 0.47 (0.08–2.94) 0.42
1

All models adjust for age. Adjusting for diabetes status, regular aspirin use, education, smoking, menopausal hormone therapy, physical activity, alcohol, dietary calcium, calcium from supplements, dietary fiber, red meat intake, or body mass index did not substantially modify these results (i.e., no point estimate differed by more than 10% from the age-adjusted odds ratio).

2

In models of distal adenomas, case subjects were defined as those with only distal adenomas. Similarly, in models of proximal adenomas, case subjects were defined as those with only proximal adenomas. Subjects with both distal and proximal adenomas were categorized separately.