Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 19.
Published in final edited form as: Popul Dev Rev. 2012;38(1):55–81. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4457.2012.00472.x

Table 3.

Changes in the shares of cohabitation among women 25-29 in a union in the 25 regions with respectively the lowest and the highest initial levels of cohabitation in 1970

25 Regions with the lowest % of cohabiting unions in 1970 25 Regions with the highest % of cohabiting unions in 1970
Region Country % 1970 % 2000 Region Country % 1970 % 2000


1 Azuay Ecuador 1.6 12.1 Kuna Yala (San Blas) Panama 90.6 85.1
2 Del Maule Ecuador 2.4 18.2 Darien Panama 81.0 82.1
3 Magallanes y Antartica Chilena Chile 2.5 18.1 Bocas del Toro* Panama 78.4 73.9
4 Tungurahua Ecuador 2.7 8.7 Los Rios Ecuador 75.3 74.4
5 Del Libertador General Bernardo O’Higgins Chile 3.0 19.5 Cocle Panama 70.7 75.7
6 Parana Brazil 3.1 28.9 Chiriqui* Panama 69.9 61.4
7 Guanajuato Mexico 3.3 7.1 Veraguas* Panama 68.6 68.2
8 Cordoba Argentina 3.3 32.6 Los Santos Panama 65.3 61.1
9 Ceara Brazil 3.4 35.7 Apure Venezuela 60.8 65.6
10 Queretaro Mexico 3.4 16.2 Esmeraldas Ecuador 60.7 75.4
11 Santa Catarina Brazil 3.5 30.4 Cojedes Venezuela 58.2 62.0
12 Valparaiso Colombia 3.5 23.9 Choco Colombia 57.1 87.4
13 Minas Gerais Brazil 3.7 26.0 Formosa Argentina 52.1 59.1
14 Loja Ecuador 3.8 11.6 Colon Panama 51.7 62.0
15 Region Metropolitana de Santiago Chile 3.9 24.8 Cordoba Colombia 50.8 79.5
16 Cotopaxi Ecuador 3.9 13.6 Amazonas Venezuela 50.4 67.6
17 Piaui Brazil 4.0 27.6 Yaracuy Venezuela 50.2 63.9
18 Aguascalientes Mexico 4.1 9.3 Delta Amacuro Venezuela 49.5 67.8
19 Bio-Bio Chile 4.1 19.0 Guayas Ecuador 48.3 50.7
20 Sao Paulo Brazil 4.3 34.8 Panama Panama 47.4 57.2
21 Chimborazo Ecuador 4. 6 8.5 La Guajira Colombia 47.4 82.8
22 Cartago Costa Rica 4.6 15.5 Herrera Panama 47.1 50.7
23 Rio Grande do Sul Brazil 4.9 40.6 Portuguesa Venezuela 46.7 60.6
24 Canar Ecuador 4.9 16.2 Cesar Colombia 46.4 74.3
25 Carchi Ecuador 5.5 19.1 Monagas Venezuela 46.3 52.9

Note:

*

The decrease in the % of cohabitation unions in these regions can be explained by the creation of a new region in Panama in the 2000 round, which was created from them (Ngöble-Bugle; 2000 = 88,44%).

Source: Own calculations based on Latin American census microdata from IPUMS international.