Skip to main content
. 2012 May 15;52(6):743–752. doi: 10.1093/icb/ics075

Table 4.

Summary of genetic variation in 12 local populations of K. marmoratus from the Florida Keys

Population N P NA AR HE HO FIS S
LK 31 0.84 4.2 3.8 0.486 0.061 0.875 0.93
NNKB 13 0.88 3.9 3.9 0.522 0.038 0.929 0.96
NNKN 2 0.63 1.6 nc 0.417 0 1 1.00
BP 70 0.81 4.9 4.0 0.491 0.024 0.951 0.97
LION 6 0.75 2.3 nc 0.424 0 1 1.00
CF 36 0.78 3.7 3.1 0.390 0.004 0.989 0.99
DC 26 0.81 4.4 3.9 0.451 0.076 0.835 0.91
LMC 4 0.72 2.0 nc 0.381 0.055 0.874 0.93
PLT 3 0.69 1.9 nc 0.404 0.042 0.916 0.96
TW 4 0.47 1.5 nc 0.206 0.008 0.967 0.98
UM 2 0.47 1.5 nc 0.323 0.031 0.933 0.97
CRWL 4 0.56 1.8 nc 0.323 0.008 0.979 0.99
Mean 0.70 2.8 nc 0.402 0.029 0.933 0.97

N, number of individuals; P95, proportion of polymorphic loci (95% criterion); NA, average number of alleles; AR, allelic richness; HE, gene diversity; HO, observed heterozygosity; FIS, coefficient of inbreeding; S, selfing rate. All FIS values are significant (P < 0.001) as determined by randomization tests in FSTAT (Goudet 1995). AR is based on sample size of 13 individuals; it was not calculated (nc) for smaller samples.