Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2013 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012 Sep 29;130(5):1078–1084. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.058

Table IV.

Mean changes in ASUI scores as a function of changes in percent predicted FEV1 values and ACQ scores

N (pts.)** Mean change in ASUI (95% CI) P value
Changes in percent predicted FEV1
Better (ΔFEV1 ≥ 10%) 213 (163) 0.05 (0.03, 0.07)
Same (−10% ≤ ΔFEV1 <10%) 1657 (384) 0.01 (0.00, 0.01)
Worse (ΔFEV1 ≤−10%) 222 (170) −0.03 (−0.05, −0.02) <0.0001
Changes in ACQ* (Δ ACQ)
Better ΔACQ ≥ −1.5 76 (68) 0.32 (0.28, 0.35)
−1.0 ≤ ΔACQ < −1.5 111 (100) 0.15 (0.13, 0.18)
−0.5 ≤ ΔACQ < −1.0 255 (198) 0.09 (0.08, 0.10)
Same +0.5 > ΔACQ < −0.5 1254 (369) 0.00 (−0.00, 0.01)
Worse +1.0 > ΔACQ ≥ +0.5 233 (175) −0.09 (−0.10, −0.07)
+1.5 > ΔACQ ≥ +1.0 78 (69) −0.17 (−0.20, −0.14)
ΔACQ ≥ + 1.5 61 (53) −0.32 (−0.36, −0.28) <0.0001

Note: MID for ACQ is 0.5 points

ACQ: Asthma Control Ques ionnaire, ASUI: Asthma Symptom Utility Index, FEV1: Forced expiratoryvolume in the first second

*

ACQ: Better = decrease by ≥ 0.5 points; same = change by <0.5 points; Worse = increase by ≥ 0.5 points.

**

N denotes frequency of events and “pts.” indicates the number of patients