Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 18;2(11):2895–2911. doi: 10.1002/ece3.397

Table A5.

Sequences were serially removed from sample sets. For each population comparison, ΦST was calculated and averaged across all possible combinations of removed samples, and compared with the observed ΦST value

Number of samples removed Average ΦST Standard error % change
PRI versus Canada-Greenland
 1 0.105 0.008 −4.2%
 2 0.089 0.014 13.5%
 3 0.090 0.016 11.1%
 4 0.096 0.021 4.6%
 5 0.102 0.021 −0.7%
PRI versus BBDS
 1 0.067 0.009 −1.7%
 2 0.058 0.010 15.9%
 3 0.059 0.013 10.5%
 4 0.064 0.016 2.8%
 5 0.069 0.016 −3.9%
PRI versus HBFB
 1 0.102 0.025 4.7%
 2 0.095 0.014 12.9%
 3 0.096 0.016 10.7%
 4 0.102 0.021 4.5%
 5 0.107 0.021 −0.1%
PRI versus BCB
 1 0.035 0.006 −7.6%
 2 0.028 0.008 24.5%
 3 0.028 0.010 13.9%
 4 0.034 0.013 −2.1%
 5 0.035 0.014 −4.8%
PRI versus Okhotsk
 1 0.114 0.006 −1.5%
 2 0.098 0.009 8.1%
 3 0.098 0.010 12.2%
 4 0.101 0.014 9.6%
 5 0.104 0.015 7.5%
PRI versus Spitsbergen
 1 0.051 0.028 1.7%
 2 0.033 0.008 15.7%
 3 0.035 0.011 33.0%
 4 0.041 0.016 22.1%
 5 0.040 0.013 23.4%