Skip to main content
. 2012 Nov 1;62(3):216–222. doi: 10.1270/jsbbs.62.216

Table 2.

Comparison of phenotypic and marker-assisted background selection in BC2F1 generation

Population Plant No. Rank %R allele No. of heterozygous markers

Phenotypic
14 TB1-14-11 6 93.8 8
TB2-14-27 1 96.1 5
TB3-14-47 2 91.4 11
TB4-14-72 3 89.1 14
TB5-14-81 7 94.5 7
TB6-14-124 5 89.8 13
TB7-14-104 4 85.9 18
396 TB8-396-2 3 89.8 13
TB9-396-18 1 90.6 12
TB10-396-26 5 93.8 8
TB11-396-45 2 86.7 17
TB12-396-66 4 96.1 5
TB13-396-89 6 89.1 14
TB14-396-37 7 89.8 13
445 TB15-445-8 6 80.5 25
TB16-445-18 2 82.0 23
TB17-445-37 5 83.6 21
TB18-445-32 4 93.8 8
TB19-445-48 3 82.8 22
TB20-445-51 1 85.2 19
TB21-445-70 7 88.3 15

Correl.a = −0.075 Ave = 89.2 Ave = 14
a

Correlation coefficient between phenotypic ranking and % of recipient alleles.