Table 4.
Comparison of phenotypic and marker-assisted background selection in BC3F2 generation
Plant No. | H | A | B | Phenotypic rank at flowering | % Recipient allele |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
396-18-158-1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | 4 | 97.2 |
396-18-158-22 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 93.8 |
396-18-158-53 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 96.5 |
196-18-158-54 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 92.4 |
396-18-158-121 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 10 | 92.4 |
396-18-158-133 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 95.8 |
396-18-158-138 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 91.7 |
396-18-158-148 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 94.4 |
396-18-158-157 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 95.1 |
396-18-158-163 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 8 | 95.8 |
| |||||
Ave. = 4.5 | Correl.a = −0.087 | Ave = 94.5 |
Correlation coefficient between phenotypic ranking at flowering stage and % of recipient alleles.