Skip to main content
. 2012 Sep 24;12:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-148

Table 2.

Multivariate odds ratios of non-response to a second assessment of body weight in the EPIC-PANACEA studya

 
Participants available for 2nd assessment (n= 460,691)
 
  Number of participants n Non-responders (n= 84,876) n (%) ORb 95% CI
Sex
Missing
0
 
 
 
Male
130,030
26,190 (20.1)
1.0
 
Female
330,661
58,686 (17.7)
0.92
0.90, 0.94
Age
Missing
0
 
 
 
≤40 years
50,789
14,911 (29.4)
1.0
 
41-60 years
317,177
51,997 (16.4)
0.48
0.47, 0.49
>60 years
92,725
17,968 (19.4)
0.51
0.50, 0.53
Marital status
Missing
106,239
 
 
 
Married/living together
279,994
52,581 (18.8)
1.0
 
Living alonec
74,458
19,077 (25.6)
1.4
1.37, 1.43
Highest educational level
Missing
19,063
 
 
 
College or university
110,246
18,893 (17.1)
1.0
 
Other secondary school
100,618
15,447 (15.4)
0.93
0.90, 0.95
Vocational secondary school
104,299
23352 (22.4)
1.08
1.05, 1.10
Primary school or less
126,465
22,300 (17.6)
1.35
1.31, 1.38
Cambridge physical activity index
Missing
65,002
 
 
 
Active
73,596
13,859 (18.8)
1.0
 
Moderately active
96,772
14,710 (15.2)
0.98
0.95, 1.01
Moderately inactive
137,438
20,802 (15.1)
0.99
0.96, 1.01
Inactive
87,883
14,593 (16.6)
1.15
1.12, 1.19
Smoking status
Missing
9,722
 
 
 
Never
227,854
37,297 (16.4)
1.0
 
Former
122,690
23,209 (18.9)
1.02
1.00, 1.04
Current
100,425
22,452 (22.7)
1.33
1.30, 1.35
Alcohol consumption
Missing
0
 
 
 
Light alcohol users
302,995
59,630 (19.7)
1.0
 
Non-users
61,316
10,467 (17.1)
1.18
1.15, 1.21
Moderate alcohol users
84,255
12,901 (15.3)
0.96
0.93, 0.98
Heavy alcohol users
12,125
1,878 (15.5)
1.12
1.06, 1.19
Cancer at baseline
Missing
16,618
 
 
 
No
423,646
76,910 (18.2)
1.0
 
Yes
20,427
3,954 (19.4)
0.86
0.81, 0.91
Chronic disease at baselined
Missing
45,998
 
 
 
Healthy
378,342
63,115 (16.7)
1.0
 
Disease
36,351
7,027 (19.3)
1.33
1.27, 1.39
Cancer before 2ndweight assessment
Missing
0
 
 
 
No
448,198
81,752 (18.2)
1.0
 
Yes
12,493
3,124 (25.0)
1.39
1.33, 1.45
BMI
Missing
334
 
 
 
18.5 - 25 kg/m2
236,019
43,404 (18.4)
1.0
 
< 18.5 kg/m2
6,868
1,451 (21.1)
1.16
1.09, 1.23
25 - 29.9 kg/m2
157,093
29,072 (18.5)
1.08
1.06, 1.10
≥ 30 kg/m2
60,377
10,850 (18.0)
1.26
1.23, 1.29
Recruitment strategy
Missing
0
 
 
 
Postal survey
353,699
71,436 (20.2)
1.0
 
Approached by elephone
76,924
2,546 (3.3)
0.16
0.15, 0.16
Requested to visit study center
30,068
10,894 (36.2)
2.7
2.58, 2.78
Mean follow-up time
Missing
0
 
 
 
0 - 4.0 years
160,750
15,867 (9.9)
1.0
 
4.1 - 8.0 years
230,155
51,978 (22.6)
3.00
2.91, 3.06
8.1 - 12.0 years 69,786 17,031 (24.4) 3.26 3.16, 3.36

Abbreviations: OR - odds ratio; CI - confidence interval.

a Participants who were not (yet) approached, died or (e)migrated during follow-up were not excluded in the present analyses.

b A multivariate logistic regression model was used with response status (0 = responder; 1 = non-responder) as the dependent variable and all baseline characteristics, recruitment strategy and mean follow-up time as independent variables. All variables are mutually adjusted.

c Single, divorced/separated, widowed.

d Hypertension, stroke, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus.