Table 3.
PFL appearance and recovery rates in 1995 and occupational exposure factors in 1990 by gender (Logistic Regression)
| |
Appearance of PFL |
|
Recovery from PFL |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |
Women |
Men |
Women |
Men |
||||
| Order | OR (95% CI) | Order | OR (95% CI) | Order | OR (95% CI) | Order | OR (95% CI) | |
|
Emotional reactions |
1 |
|
1 |
|
2 |
|
3 |
|
| No |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| Yes |
|
1.6 (1.4–1.9) |
|
1.75(1.5–2.0) |
|
0.7 (0.5–0.9) |
|
0.8 (0.7–0.9) |
|
Age (born in) |
2 |
|
3 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
| 1953 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| 1948 |
|
1.1 (0.9–1.4) |
|
1.0 (0.9–1.2) |
|
0.7 (0.6–0.9) |
|
0.9 (0.7–1.2) |
| 1943 |
|
1.6 (1.3–1.9) |
|
1.4 (1.2–1.6) |
|
0.5 (0.4–0.7) |
|
0.9 (0.7–1.1) |
| 1938 |
|
1.7 (1.4–2.1) |
|
1.8 (1.5–2.1) |
|
0.4 (0.3–0.6) |
|
0.6 (0.5–0.8) |
|
Sporting activities |
3 |
|
4 |
|
3 |
|
4 |
|
| No |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
1 |
| Yes |
|
0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
|
0.85 (0.7–0.95) |
|
1.3 (1.1–1.5) |
|
1.2 (1.0–1.5) |
|
Awkward work |
4 |
|
2 |
|
// |
|
2 |
|
| No factors |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
| 1 factor |
|
0.9 (0.7–1.1) |
|
1.2 (0.9–1.5) |
|
|
|
0.9 (0.7–1.2) |
| 2 factors |
|
1.3 (1.1–1.5) |
|
1.4 (1.2–1.8) |
|
|
|
0.9 (0.7–1.1) |
| >2 Factors |
|
1.4 (1.1–1.6) |
|
1.7 (1.3–2.0) |
|
|
|
0.7 (0.5–0.9) |
|
Having means |
5 |
|
6 |
|
// |
|
// |
|
| No |
|
1 |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
| Yes |
|
0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
|
0.7 (0.6–0.8) |
|
|
|
|
|
High decision latitude |
// |
|
5 |
|
// |
|
// |
|
| No |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
| Yes | 0.7 (0.6–0.8) | |||||||
PFL = two and more difficulties in physical abilities from upper limb, lower limb or spine problems.
Order: order that factors were entered into the logistic regression model using an ascending stepwise procedure.
OR: Odds Ratio.
CI 95%: Confidence Interval 95%.
Adjusted for age, physical factors (awkward work, precise, repetitive work, non-standard hours), psychosocial factors (high decision latitude, psychological pressure, having means), sporting activities, emotional reactions.
//: Factors not selected by the model.