Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 5;9:123. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-123

Table 2.

Walkability parameters, vehicle ownership and MVPA. Numbers represent regression coefficients (95% confidence intervals)

  a paths b pathsa c paths c’ paths Indirect effects (a paths*b paths) Proportion mediated
Residential density
−0.53
−3.05
6.81
5.20
1.61
24%
 
(−0.60; -0.46)
(−4.50; -1.59)
(4.35; 9.27)
(2.63; 7.77)
(0.81; 2.48)
 
Residential density
−0.49
−2.95
5.86
4.42
1.44
25%
(Full modelb)
(−0.56; -0.42)
(−4.45; -1.46)
(3.37; 8.35)
(1.84; 7.01)
(0.69; 2.31)
 
Street connectivity
n/a
n/a
0.02 (−0.02; 0.07)
n/a
n/a
n/a
Street connectivity
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
(Full modelb)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Land use mix
−1.00
−3.07
10.30
7.24
3.06
30%
 
(−1.11; -0.88)
(−4.55; -1.60)
(6.25; 14.35)
(2.95; 11.53)
(1.56; 4.67)
 
Land use mix
−0.90
−3.11
8.13
5.33
2.80
34%
(Full modelb) (−1.02; -0.78) (−4.62; -1.60) (3.94; 12.32) (0.94; 9.72) (1.32; 4.25)  

a paths: Associations between walkability parameters and vehicle ownership.

b paths: Associations between vehicle ownership and MVPA (minutes/day).

c paths: Associations between walkability parameters and MVPA (minutes/day).

c’ paths: c paths adjusted for vehicle ownership.

ab paths are not based on the walkability parameters.

bAdjusted for age, gender, income and marital status.

n/a: Not applicable (as no significant association was found between the walkability parameter and the physical activity outcome).