Skip to main content
. 2012 Jul 13;12:95. doi: 10.1186/1472-6882-12-95

Table 3.

Differences between conventional GPs and Homeopaths in requirements for preferred educational media

How important do you rate the following requirements in medical information media?
    Unimportant Less important Very important Chi-Square p-value
Fast
GP
13 (5.2%)
91 (36.4%)
146 (58.4%)
12.759
0.0017
 
Hom
13 (12.9%)
48 (47.5%)
40 (39.6%)
 
 
Reliable / scientific
GP
0
23 (9.1%)
229 (90.9%)
13.453
< 0.001
 
Hom
3 (2.9%)
19 (18.1%)
83 (79.0%)
 
 
Concise
GP
0
71 (28.2%)
181 (71.8%)
33.591
< 0.001
 
Hom
6 (5.9%)
51 (50.0%)
45 (44.1%)
 
 
Relevant to practice
GP
0
17 (6.7%)
236 (93.3%)
21.889
< 0.001
 
Hom
5 (4.7%)
18 (17.0%
83 (78.3%)
 
 
With graphical material
GP
59 (23.2%)
151 (59.4%)
44 (17.3%)
0.375
0.829
 
Hom
23 (22.8%)
63 (62.4%)
15 (14.9%)
 
 
German language
GP
25 (9.9%)
125 (49.4%)
103 (40.7%)
8.48
0.014
 
Hom
21 (19.8)
39 (36.8%)
46 (43.4%)
 
 
Interactive
GP
79 (31.1%)
137 (53.9%)
38 (15%)
0.321
0.852
 
Hom
29 (28.4%)
56 (54.9%)
17 (16.7%)
 
 
User friendly
GP
8 (3.2%)
72 (28.7%)
171 (68.1%)
0.56
0.756
 
Hom
4 (3.9%)
33 (32.0%)
66 (64.1%)
 
 
Cost-effective
GP
30 (12%)
130 (51.8%)
91 (36.3%)
10.76
0.005
  Hom 9 (9.4%) 68 (70.8%) 19 (19.8%