Table 1.
Prosodic Element | Measurement | Comments | Type of Analysis | Level of Analysis and Sample Used | Rationale | Hypotheses |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Acoustic Analysis | ||||||
Pause Proportion | Percentage of time the sample contained a pitch above baseline from time of first utterance to final utterance. | This would include utterances such as “uh”, for example, as well as proper words. | Acoustic | Paragraph (Admire, Store) Sentence (Nutmeg) |
Self-generated sentences selected as the natural flow of speech was of interest. Nutmeg included in contrast as was neutral and pre-determined sentence. Analyses performed “blind” to content. |
Admire, Store SPD > HC Nutmeg SPD = HC |
Duration | Time from beginning to end of a defined speech sample. Beginning and end were determined by detecting a change in pitch. | Analogous to how fast someone speaks a given word. | Acoustic | Word (“adorable”) Word-fragment (“dora”) |
Emotional word “adorable” selected as wanted to measure impact of emotion on speech speed. “Dora” also included as unknown how short an utterance would be necessary to see group differences. |
“adorable” “dora” No hypothesis |
Attack | Rise in amplitude (loudness) over time for a given phoneme. Beginning defined as change in slope from baseline. Occasionally slope changed direction. To ensure reproducibility, end defined by maximum amplitude. |
Analogous to with how much “punch” or stress an utterance was said. Element added post-hoc as wished to explore as many variables as possible. |
Acoustic | Syllable (“Nut”, “do”) | “Nut” selected as beginning of neutral sentence. “do” was isolated from “adorable” as visual inspection of data blind to diagnostic group suggested most variation in frequency. |
“Nut” “do” No hypotheses |
Pitch Variability | Standard deviation in Hertz of the pitch maximum and minimum across an utterance, same as the standard deviation of the fundamental frequency | Change in pitch Analogous to amount of variation in inflection |
Acoustic | Sentence (Nutmeg, Puppy) Word (“adorable”) Word-fragment (“dora”) |
Predetermined sentences used in order to control for content. “adorable” and “dora” were included as it was unknown how short an utterance could be and still demonstrate group differences. |
Nutmeg SPD = HC Puppy SPD < HC “adorable” “dora” No hypotheses |
Subjective Analysis | ||||||
Rating of Amount of Pauses | Mean amount of pauses along Likert scale perceived by raters. | Tapped into same aspect of speech as pause proportion above, but subjectively rated | Subjective | Paragraph (Admire, Store) | Self-generated paragraphs used in order to have naturalistic sample. Raters likely unable to “blind” themselves to content, that is, their assessments may be affected by content. Unknown the degree to which raters “tuned out” the “ums” and “ahs” that occur naturally in speech. |
Admire SPD > HC Store SPD > HC |
Emotion Portrayed | Mean degree along Likert scale that the raters thought the subject spoke with emotion. | How emotional the subject sounded Admire minus Store added post-hoc |
Subjective | Paragraph (Admire, Store) Paragraph (Admire minus Store) |
Self-generated paragraphs used in order to have naturalistic sample. Admire minus Store was examined to see if subjects altered the emotional valence of their speech with the more evocative probe, Admire, than they did with the less evocative probe, Store. Raters likely unable to “blind” themselves to content, that is, their assessments may be affected by content. |
Admire SPD < HC Store SPD < HC Admire – Store SPD < HC |
Hear More | Mean degree along Likert scale that the raters said that they wanted to hear more from the subject. | Subjective | Paragraph (Admire, Store) | Self-generated paragraphs used in order to have naturalistic sample. Raters likely unable to “blind” themselves to content, that is, their assessments may be affected by content. |
Admire SPD < HC Store SPD < HC |