Skip to main content
. 2012 Apr 2;15(12):2228–2236. doi: 10.1017/S1368980012000857

Table 4.

Associations of food security status with BMI and obesity among low-income women: California Health Interview Survey, 2003–2009

Obesity (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2)
BMI (kg/m2) Weighted %
n % Mean se Adjusted difference* 95 % CI Mean se Adjusted PR* 95 % CI
All low-income women
High/marginal food security 13 482 62 26·9 0·1 Ref. 24·8 0·6 Ref.
Low food security 5342 25 28·1 0·2 0·3 −0·0, 0·7 29·7 1·0 1·04 0·97, 1·13
Very low food security 3273 13 29·0 0·3 0·9 0·4, 1·4 35·1 1·6 1·14 1·04, 1·25
Non-Hispanic white
High/marginal food security 4883 63 26·3 0·1 Ref. 23·7 0·9 Ref.
Low food security 1515 19 27·3 0·3 0·6 −0·1, 1·2 28·6 2·0 1·09 0·95, 1·25
Very low food security 1409 19 27·6 0·4 0·3 −0·3, 1·0 28·5 2·6 1·01 0·85, 1·21
African American
High/marginal food security 860 57 28·5 0·4 Ref. 36·5 2·6 Ref.
Low food security 359 24 29·9 0·6 0·4 −0·9, 1·8 40·1 3·8 1·06 0·85, 1·31
Very low food security 299 19 30·3 1·1 1·4 −0·4, 3·2 37·2 5·3 1·00 0·75, 1·32
Hispanic/Latino
High/marginal food security 5763 60 27·8 0·1 Ref. 28·5 0·9 Ref.
Low food security 2838 28 28·6 0·2 0·2 −0·3, 0·6 31·7 1·3 1·00 0·91, 1·10
Very low food security 1265 12 29·8 0·4 1·1 0·4, 1·9 40·0 2·3 1·22 1·08, 1·38
Asian
High/marginal food security 1594 73 22·7 0·2 Ref. 4·9 1·1 Ref.
Low food security 474 23 24·3 0·5 1·1 0·3, 2·0 10·9 3·3 1·57 0·95, 2·60
Very low food security 110 4 24·3 0·7 0·4 −1·2, 1·9 10·6 4·5 0·99 0·37, 2·65
Multi-racial
High/marginal food security 382 60 26·4 0·5 Ref. 17·9 3·0 Ref.
Low food security 156 22 26·9 1·0 −0·2 −2·0, 1·6 27·3 5·3 1·25 0·80, 1·97
Very low food security 190 18 29·3 1·0 0·9 −1·1, 2·9 36·7 5·2 1·37 0·98, 1·92

Ref., reference category.

*From linear and Poisson regression models adjusted for age categories, birthplace, English proficiency, general health status, smoking status, family type, employment status, poverty level and education level. Models for all low-income women additionally adjusted for race/ethnicity.