Table 2.
Paper | Pathology | Feature | Experiment results | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bleeding | Polyp | Tumor | Ulcer | Color | Texture | Shape | Image count | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
Chen et al. [3] | √ | √ | 1,857,657 | 71.54% | N/A | |||||
Lau and Correia [6] | √ | √ | 1,705 | 88.30% | N/A | |||||
Liu and Yuan [7] | √ | √ | 800 | 99.73% | 98.89% | |||||
Giritharan et al. [8] | √ | √ | 275,000 | 83.1% | 93.6% | |||||
Penna et al. [9] | √ | √ | 1,111 | 92% | 88% | |||||
Karargyris and Bourbakis [10] | √ | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
Li and Meng [11, 12] | √ | √ | √ | 200 | 92.6% | 91% | ||||
Li and Meng [13, 14] | √ | √ | 100 | 93.28% | 91.46% | |||||
Karargyris and Bourbakis [15] | √ | √ | 50 | 100% | 67.5% | |||||
Iakovidis et al. [16] | √ | √ | 4,000 | 87.5% | N/A | |||||
Karargyris and Bourbakis [17] | √ | √ | 50 | 75% | 73.3% | |||||
Li et al. [18] | √ | √ | 300 | 89.8% | 82.5% | |||||
Barbosa et al. [19] | √ | √ | 192 | 98.7% | 96.6% | |||||
Barbosa et al. [20] | √ | √ | 600 | 97.4% | 97.5% | |||||
Karkanis et al. [21] | √ | √ | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||
Li and Meng [22] | √ | √ | 300 | 97.33% | 96% |
Sensitivity = Number of True Postives/(Number of True Postives + Number of False Negatives). Sensitivity of 100% means no positives are incorrectly marked as negative. In other words, the test recognizes all positives.
Specificity = Number of True Negatives/(Number of True Negatives + Number of False Postives). Specificity of 100% means no negatives are incorrectly marked as positive. In other words, the test recognizes all negatives.
N/A: data is not available.