Table 1.
Enrichment culture | % enrichment in “Ca. Methylomirabilis oxyfera”a | Relative abundance (%) of: |
||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
C14:0 | 10MeC14:0 | isoC15 | aiC15 | isoC16 | C16:1tot | C16:0 | 10MeC16:1Δ7 | 10MeC16:0 | C18:1tot | C18:0 | C19:cyc | C20:0 | C22:0 | C24:0 | C26:0 | C28:0 | Sum | Branchede | ||
Ooij1b | 70–80 | 0.8 | 0.4 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 1.1 | 2.5 | 26.2 | 4.2 | 45.9 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 5.2 | 97.2 | 56.0 | |||||
Ooij2b | 70–80 | 0.6 | 0.8 | 2.3 | 1.0 | 3.9 | 2.0 | 19.0 | 6.6 | 45.6 | 6.7 | 2.3 | 5.8 | 96.6 | 62.3 | |||||
Ooij3b | 70–80 | 0.5 | 0.7 | 1.3 | 2.4 | 2.6 | 3.2 | 17.8 | 7.3 | 34.9 | 4.8 | 3.0 | 18.0 | 96.6 | 50.9 | |||||
WWTPb | 70–80 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 1.5 | 4.3 | 5.8 | 21.1 | 10.1 | 37.8 | 8.6 | 1.4 | 2.3 | 97.6 | 58.3 | |||||
TWKc | 0.8 | 2.3 | 6.8 | 11.4 | 5.5 | 28.9 | 14.3 | 2.8 | 12.7 | 85.5 | 42.9 | |||||||||
BRH 11 md | 15–25 | 1.0 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 13.2 | 8.9 | 3.4 | 9.4 | 38.6 | 3.1 | 4.1 | 3.2 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 1.9 | 95.6 | 15.8 | ||
BRH 14 md | 45–55 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.3 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 16.6 | 14.9 | 9.4 | 21.9 | 19.4 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 0.9 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.7 | 96.5 | 36.4 |
BRH 17 md | 65–75 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 14.0 | 19.0 | 10.5 | 27.4 | 14.5 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 0.9 | 0.5 | 95.5 | 42.7 |
Approximate enrichment of the culture based on FISH analyses.
Averaged data of replicate lipid analyses: n = 3 for Ooij1 and Ooij3 and n = 2 for Ooij2 and WWTP.
Data are from Raghoebarsing et al. (42).
11 m, 14 m, and 17 m denote 11, 14, and 17 months of enrichment of the BRH culture, respectively.
Branched FA as a percentage of the sum of FA (in the preceding column).
Compounds comprising <0.5% of the total FA are omitted.