Skip to main content
. 2012 Dec;50(12):4128–4130. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02549-12

TABLE 1.

P. falciparum cross-contamination evaluationa

Sample Values for each method
Conventional punch
Laser cut
CT Log10 copies (12.0-mm spot) Parasites/ml CT Log10 copies (8.9-mm spot) Parasites/ml
+++ 22.49 6.76 65,173 21.85 6.95 184,330
32.34 3.83 77 ND ND ND
+++ 21.79 6.96 105,249 21.75 6.98 197,394
37.81 2.20 2 ND ND ND
+++ 21.39 7.08 138,409 21.47 7.06 239,108
37.09 2.41 3 ND ND ND
+++ 19.98 6.96 103,338 20.10 6.92 173,978
41.99 0.48 <1 ND ND ND
+++ 19.30 7.15 163,121 20.79 6.72 109,478
34.55 2.71 6 ND ND ND
+++ 19.59 7.07 134,265 20.82 6.71 107,296
ND ND ND ND ND ND
+++ 19.33 7.15 159,869 20.73 6.74 113,978
32.73 3.24 20 ND ND ND
+++ 19.57 7.08 136,080 20.03 6.94 182,349
36.02 2.28 2 ND ND ND
++ 27.18 5.36 2,627 27.5 5.27 3,850
35.45 2.90 9 ND ND ND
++ 26.84 5.46 3,315 27.69 5.21 3,381
43.66 ND <1 ND ND ND
++ 27.00 5.41 2,971 26.95 5.43 5,611
ND ND 0 ND ND ND
++ 25.36 5.39 2,791 25.89 5.23 3,568
ND ND 0 ND ND ND
++ 24.64 5.60 4,525 26.53 5.05 2,322
ND ND 0 ND ND ND
++ 24.77 5.56 4,147 26.82 4.96 1,911
ND ND 0 ND ND ND
a

Shading denotes cross-contaminated samples based on detection of any 18S rRNA template in the sample. Data were from two experiments using different lots of reagent, a switch which accounts for the shift in threshold cycle (CT) values; assays were recalibrated for each reagent lot. ND, not detected; +++, 4 × 107 parasites/ml; ++, 8 × 103 parasites/ml; −, negative controls.