Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 29;109(46):18932–18937. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1216264109

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

Maze running and reward drinking during IL perturbation. (A and B) Percentage of correct performance on trials with instruction to devalued goal (A) or to nondevalued goal (B). *P < 0.05; #P < 0.01; +P < 0.001; differences lacking symbols indicate not significantly different. (C and D) Percentage of drinking of devalued reward (C) and nondevalued reward (D) when the trial was run correctly. The inverse is runs to the devalued goal without drinking. (E) Home-cage drinking of devalued reward for IL-halo group in two light-on and light-off sessions after devaluation (“Early” test, conducted around PP1–PP2), and in light-on and light-off sessions after habit reinstatement (“Late” test, conducted around PP9). *P < 0.05 compared with predevaluation intake (“Pre,” dashed gray line); +P < 0.05 compared with intake just after devaluation (“Post”). (Right) Home-cage drinking of devalued reward for control group (around PP9).