Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2012 Nov 21.
Published in final edited form as: Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Aug;30(8):1488–1497. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0994

EXHIBIT 3.

Exposure To Promotional Strategies Reported By Couples Who Came To A Testing Center

Strategy
Site and decision Influence network agent onlya Other strategies onlyb Influence network agent and other strategiesc Total influence agent Total other strategies
n % n % n % n % n %
Kitwe
 Tested 1,265 62 266 13 523 25 1,788 75 789 33
 Not tested 680 75 46 5 177 20 857 85 223 22
Total 1,945 66 312 10 700 24 2,645 78 1,012 30
Ndola
 Tested 1,822 63 368 13 677 24 2,499 78 1,045 32
 Not tested 837 81 17 2 176 17 1,013 96 193 18
Total 2,659 68 385 10 853 22 3,512 82 1,238 29
Kitwe and Ndola
 Tested 3,087 63 634 13 1,200 24 4,287 77 1,834 32
 Not tested 1,517 79 63 3 353 18 1,870 91 416 20
Total 4604 67 697 10 1,553 23 6,157 80 2,250 29

SOURCE Authors’ analysis of data from the testing centers. NOTE Of the 7,688 couples who came to the centers, 834 did not report exposure to any promotional strategy.

a

Invited by influence agent, reported no exposure to other promotional strategies.

b

Not invited by influence agent, reported exposure to other promotional strategies.

c

Invited by influence agent, reported exposure to other promotional strategies.