Table 1.
Frequency (%) where scleral spur landmark identification was within 80 μm.
| All eyes (N = 31) by 2 observers (with adjudicator) |
Open-angle eyes (N = 12) by 2 observers (with adjudicator) |
Nonopen-angle eyes (N = 19) by 2 observers (with adjudicator) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| x-axis | |||
|
| |||
| All quadrants | 106 (85%) (118 (95%)) |
44 (92%) (46 (96%)) |
62 (82%) (72 (95%)) |
|
| |||
| Horizontal | |||
| Nasal | 25 (81%) (29 (94%)) |
9 (75%) (11 (92%)) |
16 (84%) (18 (95%)) |
| Temporal | 28 (90%) (30 (97%)) |
12 (100%) (12 (100%)) |
16 (84%) (18 (95%)) |
| Vertical | |||
| Superior | 25 (81%) (29 (94%)) |
11 (92%) (11 (92%)) |
14 (74%) (18 (95%)) |
| Inferior | 28 (90%) (30 (97%)) |
12 (100%) (12 (100%)) |
16 (84%) (18 (95%)) |
|
| |||
|
P value (H versus V) |
1.000 (1.000) |
0.3173 (1.000) |
0.5271 (1.000) |
|
| |||
| y-axis | |||
|
| |||
| All quadrants | 108 (87%) (117 (94%)) |
41 (85%) (44 (92%)) |
67 (88%) (73 (96%)) |
|
| |||
| Horizontal | |||
| Nasal | 29 (94%) (30 (97%)) |
11 (92%) (12 (100%)) |
18 (95%) (18 (95%)) |
| Temporal | 28 (90%) (29 (94%)) |
11 (92%) (11 (92%)) |
17 (89%) (18 (95%)) |
| Vertical | |||
| Superior | 27 (87%) (30 (97%)) |
10 (83%) (11 (92%)) |
17 (89%) (19 (100%)) |
| Inferior | 24 (77%) (28 (90%)) |
9 (75%) (10 (83%)) |
15 (79%) (18 (95%)) |
|
| |||
|
P value (H versus V) |
0.1088 (0.7055) |
0.1797 (0.3173) |
0.3173 (0.5637) |
|
| |||
| Both x- and y-axes | |||
|
| |||
| All quadrants | 96 (77%) (112 (90%)) |
38 (79%) (42 (88%)) |
58 (76%) (70 (92%)) |
|
| |||
| Horizontal | |||
| Nasal | 25 (81%) (29 (94%)) |
9 (75%) (11 (92%)) |
16 (84%) (18 (95%)) |
| Temporal | 27 (87%) (29 (94%)) |
11 (92%) (11 (92%)) |
16 (84%) (18 (95%)) |
| Vertical | |||
| Superior | 22 (71%) (28 (90%)) |
9 (75%) (10 (83%)) |
13 (68%) (18 (95%)) |
| Inferior | 22 (71%) (26 (84%)) |
9 (75%) (10 (83%)) |
13 (68%) (16 (84%)) |
|
| |||
|
P value (H versus V) |
0.1025 (0.2482) |
0.4795 (0.4795) |
0.1336 (0.3173) |