Table 2.

Opinion questionnaire after clinical sessions: Usefulness of Second Life for teaching I

Question	Answer	% (n/N)
Do you consider this to be an interactive method?	“yes”	68.42% (52/76)
	“partly”, “perhaps”	31.58% (24/76)
How did you feel about interacting with other health centres?	“good”, “very good”, “excellent”,“perfect”, “more participation”, “it's very important and it's also in real time”	100% (76/76)
What did you think about the interaction with teaching staff?	“good”, “adequate”	85.53% (65/76)
	“little”, “minimal”	14.47% (11/76)
What did you think about the interaction with other health professionals?	“adequate”, “good”, “it works very well”	43.42% (33/76)
	“almost non-existent”, “we wouldn’t have participated even if we could have”	56.58% (43/76)
Do you think it facilitates the exchange of medical information?	“yes”	77.63% (59/76)
	“several people with a single connection limited participation”	22.37% (17/76)
	no response	7.89% (6/76)
Do you think it facilitates learning?	“yes”, “of course” and “it’s a comfortable way”	100% (76/76)
Do you think it facilitates debate?	“yes”, “more when participation was on an individual basis”	22.37% (17/76)
	“somewhat”, “it makes debate a little difficult”, “not so much, but it could”	60.53% (46/76)
	“no”	9.21% (7/76)
	no response	7.89% (6/76)

SL: Second Life.