Skip to main content
. 2012 Oct 31;5:246. doi: 10.1186/1756-3305-5-246

Table 2.

Statistical comparison1of the number of Culicoides collected at six locations2

Site (municipality) Year (no. of trappings) Total no. Culicoides (%3) p-value No.Culicoides of morphological group (%3)
Obsoletus
Pulicaris
Other Culicoides
p-value p-value p-value
Commugny
2008 (14)
1,440 (75.4)
1,234 (73.4)
159 (91.4)
47 (85.3)
 
2009 (18)
1,130 (55.9)
1,079 (55.5)
15 (68.2)
36 (64.3)
 
2010 (19)
1,751 (58.8)
1,704 (58.3)
10 (66.7)
37 (97.4)
 
 
0.622
0.564
0.102
0.969
Wädenswil
2008 (19)
16,603 (88.7)
15,022 (88.1)
1,215 (94.3)
366 (100.0)
 
2009 (17)
23,306 (91.7)
22,387 (91.8)
564 (87.3)
355 (98.6)
 
2010 (19)
19,351 (96.1)
18,495 (96.1)
576 (93.8)
280 (97.2)
 
 
0.588
0.574
0.040*
0.663
Mühlethurnen
2008 (18)
4,179 (58.3)
4,011 (59.5)
98 (30.3)
70 (73.7)
 
2009 (17)
3,712 (87.9)
3,617 (88.3)
51 (82.3)
44 (66.7)
 
2010 (19)
6,015 (90.0)
5,907 (89.9)
18 (81.8)
90 (96.8)
 
 
0.889
0.857
<0.008*†
0.825
Château
2008 (18)
13,516 (95.7)
11,991 (95.7)
1,350 (96.3)
175 (95.1)
d’Oex
2009 (16)
7,177 (81.9)
5,269 (82.3)
1,390 (87.3)
518 (67.7)
 
2010 (19)
7,655 (77.2)
6,333 (75.3)
937 (83.7)
385 (99.5)
 
 
0.241
0.260
0.390
0.018*
Chaumont
2008 (19)
28,859 (94.9)
21,095 (93.5)
7,601 (99.0)
163 (99.4)
 
2009 (18)
16,725 (98.8)
12,596 (98.5)
3,951 (99.8)
178 (100.0)
 
2010 (19)
30,076 (92.3)
28,090 (93.5)
1,840 (77.0)
146 (100.0)
 
 
0.763
0.709
0.311
0.931
Juf
2008 (16)
12,215 (99.9)
165 (99.4)
11,158 (99.9)
892 (99.9)
 
2009 (19)
31,635 (94.4)
780 (90.6)
26,026 (93.7)
4,829 (98.8)
 
2010 (18)
17,145 (89.7)
203 (83.2)
15,006 (89.8)
1,936 (90.0)
    0.336 0.270 0.466 0.069

1 Kruskal-Wallis test; catches from the summer months (June to September) during the 3 years monitoring.

2 Locations with high overall sampling reliability (i.e. at least 145 of the maximal 156 weekly catches available, see Table 1).

3 Percentage of total Culicoides caught over the whole collecting season (June – May).

* Significantly different using the Kruskal-Wallis test without Bonferroni correction (p < 0.05).

Significantly different using the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction (p < 0.008).