Skip to main content
. 2012 Aug 6;12:342. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-342

Table 4.

Univariate Cox regression analysis for B, E, R, T RQ values according to progression free and overall survival


aberrant vs. normal
Progression free survival
Overall survival
    Total N Events HR 95% C.I. Wald’s p Total N Events HR 95% C.I. Wald’s p
Subgroup A
BRCA1
51 vs. 100
44 vs. 79
1.307
0.901-1.897
0.158
51 vs. 102
35 vs. 62
1.019
0.672-1.545
0.930
 
ERCC1
43 vs. 110
36 vs. 88
1.224
0.829-1.806
0.309
44 vs. 111
30 vs. 68
1.169
0.760-1.799
0.478
 
RRM1
58 vs. 95
49 vs. 75
1.348
0.936-1.939
0.108
59 vs. 96
42 vs. 56
1.141
0.760-1.715
0.524
 
TYMS
78 vs. 75
63 vs. 61
0.849
0.593-1.216
0.373
79 vs. 76
50 vs. 48
0.871
0.583-1.302
0.500
Subgroup B
BRCA1
58 vs. 113
49 vs. 87
1.313
0.921-1.872
0.132
 
 
 
 
 
 
ERCC1
50 vs. 123
41 vs. 96
1.251
0.867-1.805
0.232
 
 
 
 
 
 
RRM1
66 vs. 107
55 vs. 82
1.371
0.971-1.935
0.073
 
 
 
 
 
 
TYMS
87 vs. 86
68 vs. 69
0.922
0.656-1.297
0.642
 
 
 
 
 
Subgroup C
BRCA1
 
 
 
 
 
62 vs. 123
38 vs. 67
1.003
0.672-1.499
0.987
 
ERCC1
 
 
 
 
 
53 vs. 134
32 vs. 74
1.02
0.672-1.548
0.926
 
RRM1
 
 
 
 
 
73 vs. 114
45 vs. 61
1.059
0.718-1.562
0.772
  TYMS           95 vs. 92 56 vs. 50 1.027 0.699-1.509 0.892

Subgroup A: 1st line, chemo-naïve; Subgroup B: 1st line, chemo-naïve and pre-treated; Subgroup C: chemo-naïve, 1st line and non-relapsed adjuvant; empty cells: not-applicable.