Skip to main content
. 2012 Jun 21;12:262. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-12-262

Table 4.

The relationship between the IGF and ER mRNA expression and clinico-pathological features of endometrioid adenocarcinoma

Clinical pathology (n) IGF-1 IGF-2 IGF-1R IGF-2R IGFBP-3 ERα ERβ
Surgico-pathological stage
I(33)
1.70 ± 0.73▾
3.28 ± 2.17▾
1.62 ± 0.86
4.97 ± 2.77
14.91 ± 13.03
16.57 ± 4.1▾
42.04 ± 23.28
II(15)
0.58 ± 0.09*
1.73 ± 2.47
1.84 ± 0.96
4.70 ± 2.96*
13.25 ± 13.32
4.33 ± 2.39*
25.70 ± 24.47*
 
III(10)
0.44 ± 0.02#
0.72 ± 1.31#
1.50 ± 0.79
1.60 ± 2.50#
14.83 ± 16.79
0.72 ± 0.33#
5.07 ± 2.11#
Histological grade
G1(14)
1.44 ± 0.24
3.25 ± 2.27
1.53 ± 1.92
4.75 ± 3.01
16.22 ± 14.47
16.85 ± 4.37▴
41.93 ± 26.78
G2(31)
1.39 ± 0.95$
2.53 ± 2.38$
1.32 ± 0.99
4.92 ± 2.63$
11.78 ± 11.27
11.70 ± 6.94$
35.08 ± 23.96$
 
G2(13)
0.47 ± 0.07&
1.34 ± 2.02&
1.66 ± 0.84
2.42 ± 3.27&
18.99 ± 16.87
1.55 ± 1.79&
11.47 ± 16.42&
Depth of myometrial invasion
≤ 50%(39)
1.47 ± 0.79
3.14 ± 2.27
1.55 ± 0.90
5.26 ± 2.68
15.82 ± 12.78
14.28 ± 5.64
41.48 ± 24.10
  >50%(19) 0.63 ± 0.46@ 0.98 ± 1.76@ 1.15 ± 0.78 2.39 ± 2.75@ 11.69 ± 15.01 3.26 ± 5.86@ 10.83 ± 12.55@

▾p < 0.05 stage I vs stage II;*P < 0.05 stage II vs stage III; #P < 0.05 stage I vs stage III;▴P < 0.05 G1 vs G2;$P < 0.05 G2 vs G3;&P < 0.05 G1 vs G3;@P < 0.05 vs ≤50% of mymetrial invasion by one-way ANOVA.